SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND A.C. GUPTA, JJ.
M. Chinnaswamy, Appellant
Versus
M/s. Dhandayuthanpani Roadways (P) Ltd. Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 1710 of 1968,
D/- 13-1-1977.
Constitution Of India,1950 - Writ jurisdiction - Regional Transport Authority - Appeal relates to award of a stage carriage permit on route - Before Regional Transport Authority predecessor of appellant was awarded permit - But in appeal State Transport Appellate Tribunal upset this award by its order - Thereafter matter was taken up to High Court in writ jurisdiction and learned single Judge restores permit awarded by Regional Transport Authority but fluctuating fortunes of litigation proved at writ appeal stage that permit should go to respondents predecessor –Held, Regional Transport Authority but fluctuating fortunes litigation proved at writ appeal stage that permit should go to respondents predecessor- It is represented appearing for appellant that from about both parties had been plying their stage carriages on said route- Although permit to be granted was only one but by orders of court or other authority both parties had been allowed to ply their buses- It seems to be so obvious that in public interest if two stage carriages have been plying on route for there is no reason to confine it to one- Both sides agree that there is necessity for two permits on route- In that view we consider dispute – Court direct that status quo of both parties being allowed to ply their stage carriages on route taking appropriate permits from authorities concerned will continue- With this direction appeal is dismissed- There will be no order as to costs - Appeal dismissed
Judgment
V. R. KRISHNA IYER, J. - This appeal relates to the award of a stage carriage permit on the route Gopichattipalayam to Mambur. Before the Regional Transport Authority the predecessor of the appellant was awarded the permit on January 15, 1959. But in appeal the State Transport Appellate Tribunal upset this award by its order dated March 11, 1960. Thereafter, the matter was taken up to the High Court in writ jurisdiction and the learned single Judge restores the permit awarded by the Regional Transport Authority; but the fluctuating fortunes of the litigation proved at the writ appeal stage that the permit should go to the respondents predecessor. It is represented by Shri M. K. Ramamurthi appearing for the appellant that from about 1960, for the last 16 years, both the parties had been plying their stage carriages on the said route. Although the permit to be granted was only one, but by orders of court or other authority both the parties had been allowed to ply their buses. It seems to be so obvious that in public interest if two stage carriages have been plying on the route for the last 16 years there is no reason to confine it to one. Both sides agree that there is necessity for two permits on the route. In that view we consider the dispute to be accademic. We direct that the status quo of the both parties being allowed to ply their stage carriages on the route taking appropriate permits from the authorities concerned will continue. With this direction, the appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed.
For Citation: AIR 1977 SC 2095
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.