SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 272

A.C.GUPTA, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Dharmendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Usha Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
C.R.SAMASEKHARAN, LALITA KOHLI, M.S.GANESH, Navnit Lal, R.K.Baweja, R.VATEL, S.L.VATEL

Judgment

A. C. GUPTA, J. - On her application made under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the respondent was granted a decree for restitution of conjugal rights by the Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Delhi, on August 27, 1973. A little over two years after that decree was passed, on October 28, 1975 she presented a petition under Sec. 13 (1A) (ii) of the Act in the Court of the Additional District Judge, Delhi, for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce. Section 13 (1A) (ii) as it stood at the material time reads:

"Either party to a marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act, may also present a petition for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground-

(i) x x x

(ii) that there has been no restitution of conjugal rights as between the parties to the marriage for a period of two years or upwards after the passing of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights in a proceeding to which they were parties."

The provision was amended in 1976 reducing the period of two years to one year, but this amendment is not relevant to the present controversy. In that petition under Section 13 (1A) (ii) she - we shall hereinaft














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top