SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 299

P.S.KAILASAM, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Tula Ram – Appellant
Versus
Kishore Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.Sohal, D.MUKHERJI, HARBANS SINGH, S.N.Mehta, Uma Datta

Judgment

FAZAL ALI, J. - Whether or not a Magistrate after receiving a complaint and after directing investigation under Sec. 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) and on receipt of the final report from the police can issue notice to the complainant, record his statement and the statements of other witnesses and then issue processes under S. 204 of the Code is the question of law that falls for consideration in this appeal.

2. This is an appeal by certificate granted by the High Court under Art. 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution. The answer to the proposition mentioned above would naturally depend on the true and proper interpretation of the scope and ambit of Sections 156 (3), 190, 200, 202 and 204 of the Code.

3. Before embarking on this enquiry it may also be necessary to consider the legal import and significance of the term "taking cognizance" as used in Sections 190, 200 and 202 of the Code. Before however considering the various aspects of the matter it may be necessary to summarise the facts which have led to the enquiry in the appeal before us.

4. A criminal case was registered by the Police Officer, Police Station, Guru Har Sahai









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top