P.N.SHINGHAL, M.H.BEG
Jangbir – Appellant
Versus
Mahavir Prasad Gupta – Respondent
Judgment
BEG, J.:- Jangbir, appellant is a tenant of a room in a house which was purchased by the respondent Mahavir Prasad Gupta on 15th May, 1956, for Rs. 1930/- shown in his sale deed as situated in "Khasra No. 203, Khewat No. 1, situated at Village Chowkri Mubarakabad. Delhi Province, within the abadi of Onkar Nagar-II" The landlord owner had filed a suit for the ejectment of the appellant and for recovery of rent which was dismissed by a Subordinate Judge of Delhi on 26th May, 1966 on the ground that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court was barred by the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) which provided the only modes of relief for aggrieved landlords by proceeding under the Act.
2. The respondent landlord had alleged that the suit lay in the ordinary civil Court and that it was governed by the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act inasmuch as the house, in which the appellant was the tenant of a room. fell outside the area to which the Act was applicable. The short question on which the case was decided was whether the house of the respondent was situated in an area to which the Act had been applied by a notification under Section 507 (a) of
Nedunuri Kamcswaramma v. Sampati Subba Rao
explained : Meenakshi Mills v. C. I. T.
referred to : Deity Pattabhiramamamy v. S. Hanuamayya
Sri SinnaRamanuja Jeer v. Shri Ranga Ramanuja Jeer
Nedmuri Kameswaramma v. Sampati Suhia Rao
SM.Bhusawal Borough Municipality v. Amalgamated Electricity Co Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.