SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 464

A.C.GUPTA, P.N.SHINGHAL, P.N.BHAGWATI
Vidya Vati – Appellant
Versus
Devi Das – Respondent


Advocates:
B.P.MAHESHVARI, BIKRAMJIT NAYAR, Hardayal Hardy, K.K.Mittal, Mill Ynih Baggo, S.Baggar, S.K.Bagga, Suresh Sethi

Judgment

P. N. BHAGWATI, J.: - This is an unfortunate litigation where a widow has been kept out of her monies for over six years by reason of wrong application of law by the courts. Much of the travail of the widow could have been avoided if the courts had taken a common sense view of the law instead of adopting a rather technical and unimaginative approach. The facts giving rise to this litigation are few and may be briefly stated as follows.

2. The respondent is the owner of a residential quarter bearing No. 1/20 situate at Old Rajendra Nagar, New Delhi. He wanted a loan for the purpose of repaying an earlier debt and he, therefore, approached the appellant and as a result of negotiations between them, an agreement dated 27 th September, 1967 was entered into between the parties. This agreement recited that a sum of Rs. 7500/- was lent and advanced by the appellant to the respondent and it provided that in lieu of interest on this amount of Rs. 7500/-, the respondent would give to the appellant a portion of his residential quarter (hereinafter referred to as the premises) for temporary residence. The agreement went on to say, and we are setting out the precise terms of the agreeme

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top