SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 458

A.C.GUPTA, P.N.BHAGWATI, P.N.SHINGHAL
Parmeshwari Devi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
D.GOVERDHAN CHARY, FRANK ANTHONY, G.S.Vohra, K.L.Taneja, R.N.SACH, S.K.Gambhir

Judgment

P. N. SHINGHAL, J.:- This appeal of Smt. Parmeshwari Devi by special leave, arises from the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated April 22, 1975 dismissing her application for revision of the order of the additional Sessions Judge of Delhi dated August 29, 1974, confirming the order of a Metropolitan Magistrate of Delhi dated August 8, 1974. The facts giving rise to the appeal are quite simple and may be shortly stated.

2. A complaint was filed by respondent N. L. Gupta on behalf of Smt. Patashi Devi for the commission of offences under Sections 181, 182, 193, 197, 199, 200, 465, 466 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code by Nand Kishore, Ghanshyam Das and Sanwar Mal. It was alleged that Smt. Patashi Devi had one-fifth share in the firm of M/s. Gupta Electric and Machinery Stores of which Smt.Parmeshwari Devi (the present appellant), Smt. Dropadi Devi and Madan Lal Gupta were the other Partners. According to the complaint the Business of the firm was mainly looked after by Smt. Parmeshwari Devis husband Mohan Lal and accused No. 1 who was her brother, Smt. Patashi Devi and two other partners "retired" from the business on April 1, 1968 without settling the accounts. Smt. Patashi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top