SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 485

A.C.GUPTA, P.N.BHAGWATI
U. N. R. Rao – Appellant
Versus
M. Shanmugavel – Respondent


Judgment

BHAGWATI, J.:- This appeal under Section 15 (1) (b) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is directed against an order passed by the High Court of Madras rejecting an application for taking action for contempt of Court against the respondent. The application was moved by the appellant after obtaining the consent of the Advocate-General under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Act and it was, therefore, clearly maintainable. But the High Court being presumably unaware of the fact that the consent of the Advocate-General had been obtained under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Act, rejected the application on the ground that the High Court would not be inclined to take notice of a contempt application filed by a private party and the appellant might if so advised, approach the Advocate-General who might, if he thinks fit, file a petition for contempt of court. This was patently an erroneous order since under Since 15, sub-section (1) it is competent to the High Court to take action for contempt of Court not only on a motion being made by the Advocate-General but also on a motion made by any other person with the consent in writing of the Advoca


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top