SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(SC) 437

P.K.GOSWAMI, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Sukhad Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Harsh Misra – Respondent


Judgment

CHANDRACHUD, J.:- Both parties agree that all the disputed votes should be recounted and that the result of the election should be declared on the basis of such recounting. The recounting of undisputed votes done by the High Court under its order dated November 5, 1974 shall stand undisturbed. These undisputed votes, and the votes secured by the respective candidates as a result of recounting of disputed votes to be done under this order, shall both be taken into acount for the purpose of determining as to which candidate has polled the largest number of votes.

2. The recounting of disputed votes shall be done by or under the personal supervision of the Joint Registrar of the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench. Parties, their counsel, and their agents not exceeding three in number for each party shall be permitted to remain present at the time of recounting.

3. Both sides agree that the election petition and the appeal before us shall stand finally disposed of with this order and that no further proceedings will lie or be taken by either of the parties, after the result of the election is declared by the Joint Registrar of the High Court. This agreement, we may add, do




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top