SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 542

A.N.RAY, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD, M.H.BEG, H.R.KHANNA, K.K.MATHEW
Indira Nehru Gandhi – Appellant
Versus
Raj Narain And Vice Versa – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, J.B.DADACHAN, J.P.GOYAL, SHANTI BHUSHAN

Judgment

BEG, J. :- This application purporting to be for review of judgment and/or for clarification and/or expunging of the observations from the judgment has been filed under Order 47 of the SC Rules which indicates the inherent powers of this Court.

2. The body of the petition as well as the prayers made show that the applicant has no grievance against the common conclusions of the five learned Judges of this Court, including myself, who delivered five separate judgments in the election Civil Appeal No. 887 of 1975 and the cross appeal No. 909 of 1975, the first by Shrimati Indira Nehru Gandhi and the second by Shri Raj Narain, who were candidates at an election held in Rae Bareli constituency in Uttar Pradesh in the first week of March, 1971. This petition of the election petitioner sets out the issues framed in the Trial Court. It then states facts showing that the 39th Amendment of the Constitution as well as some amendments by the Election Laws (Amendment) Act 40 of 1975, were made before the above-mentioned appeals, filed under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 against the same judgment, were taken up for hearing by this Court. Thereafter, the petiti

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top