SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 135

V.R.KRISHNA IYER, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Shiv Mohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates:
R.N.SACH, SITAL A.K.DAR

Judgment

KRISHNA IYER, J. :- If survival after death may aptly describe any litigative phenomenon, the present review proceeding may well quality for that quaint claim. The relief of review relates to the death penalty imposed upon the petitioner by the trial Court, confirmed in appeal, and dismissed even at the stage of special leave by this Court. In the ordinary course, judicial finality has thus been affixed on the capital sentence so awarded although Presidential clemency, which has been sought and negatived, may still be open under Article 72 of the Constitution. Mercy, like divinity, is amenable to unending exercise but in this mundane matter it is for the Head of State to act and not for the apex Court.

2. Sombre sentencing is the Fifth Act in the tragedy of a murder trial and, for the Judges of the SC, assumes a grim seriousness and poignant gravity since the petitioners final appeal for judicial commutation, if rejected, may perhaps prove imminently fatal to his life. Even so, when we chronicle the events connected with the judicial proceedings in this Court it will be realised that our review power has repeatedly been invoked in vain and naturally a further exercise of th







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top