SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 298

JASWANT SINGH, P.K.GOSWAMI, P.N.SHINGHAL
Dinesh Chandra Sangma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, NIREN DEY, S.K.NANDY, S.N.CHAUDHARY

JUDGMENT

GOSWAMI, J. :— The appellant, Shri Dinesh Chandra Sangma, was a District and Sessions Judge at Dibrugarh in the State of Assam. He attained the age of 50 years on February 29, 1976. After serving for about twenty years under the Government, on account of certain domestic troubles, he did not want to continue in service after his attainment of 50 years of age. The appellant, therefore, served a notice on the Government under fundamental Rule 56 (c) as amended by the Governor of Assam under Art. 309 of the Constitution by a notification dated 22nd July 1975. By this notice the appellant formally intimated to the Government that he "propose (d) to voluntarily retire from the service" and requested the Government to treat that as a formal notice under F. R. 56. The appellant also indicated in his letter that although he served the requisite three months notice he proposed to make over charge by the afternoon of 2nd August, 1976. On July 1, 1976, the Governor of Assam by a notification of that date was "pleased to allow Shri D.C. Sangma to retire from this State Government Service with effect from 2nd August, 1976 (afternoon)". The High Court also allowed the appellant to go on




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top