SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND JASWANT SINGH, JJ.
Dadasaheb Dattatraya Pawar and others, Appellants
Versus
Pandurang Raoji Jagtap and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 41 and 42 of 1977
Decided on 13-1-1978.
Advocates appeared
Mr. V. M. Tarkunde, Sr. Advocate (Miss Manik Tarkunde, M/s. D. M. Rane and K. K. Rajendra Chaudhuri, Advocates with him), for Appellants; Mr. Y. S. Chitaley, Sr. Advocate (Mr. V. N. Ganpule and Mrs. V. D. Khanna, Advocates with him) (for No. 1) in C. A. Nos. 41 and 42 of 1977; Mr. P. M. Parekh and Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Advocates (for No. 5) in C. A. Nos. 41 and 42 of 1977; Mrs. V. D. Khanna Advocate (for No. 12) in C. A. 352 No. 42 and (for No. 18) in C.A. No. 41; Mr. M. N. Shroff Advocate (for Nos. 3 and 6 in C. A. No. 41 and (for Nos. 3 and 15) C.A. No. 12, for Respondents.
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 – Section 144 - Evidence led by the election – Condo nation of delay - Aggrieved by the result of election in so far as it related to the aforesaid two constituencies of individual members and the Co-operative Societies, respondents 1 and 2 filed two separate election petitions Nos. COP/81 (43) and COP/81 (42) under S. 144-T of the Act read with R. 74 of the Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committees Rules, 1971 challenging the validity of the aforesaid elections to the Board of Directors of the Sangh. The said election petitions though challenged on a number of grounds were allowed by the Commissioner by his aforesaid judgment and order on the sole ground that the appellants were guilty of corrupt practice as envisaged by S. 144-1 (3) of the Act in that special vehicles were hired with the knowledge and consent of the appellants for the free conveyance of voters from Bhawani Mandap to the polling station and back and used as such on the day of the poll. Section 144-I (3) of the Act under which the election of the appellants has been declared void runs as follows - Hiring or procuring whether on payment or otherwise, of any vehicle or vessel by a candidate or his agent or by any other person with the consent of a candidate or his election agent, or the use of such vehicle or vessel for the free conveyance of any elector (other than the candidate himself, the members of his family or his agent) to or from any polling station - In this clause and in the next succeeding clause, the expression "vehicle" means any vehicle used or capable of being used for the purpose of road transport, whether propelled by mechanical power or otherwise and whether used for drawing other vehicles or otherwise – Held, evidence of the last three witnesses who have attempted to support the election petitioners is clearly contradicted not only by Appasaheb Balwantrao Sawant (P.W.3) and Ashok Mahadeo Shinde (P.W.4) but also by Shankar Bajirao Gaikwad (P.W.1) and Anantrao Yashwant Suryawanshi (P.W. 2) who have categorically stated that fare at the rate of 50 paise per trip was charged from every passenger carried by them from Bhawani Mandap to Market Yard and back on the day of poll and that no one was carried free - Evidence led by the election petitioners as analysed above falls far short of the requisite proof. It does not at all establish that vehicles were procured by the appellants or their election agents or with the consent of any one of them by any other person or that the same were used for free conveyance of the voters to or from the polling station. The Commissioner manifestly went wrong in law in his approach to and assessment of the evidence adduced in the case and arrived at unwarranted conclusions merely on the basis of probabilities completely disregarding the aforementioned well settled principles that election petitions alleging commission of corrupt practices are proceedings of a quasi-criminal nature and the burden lies heavily on those who assail the election of a returned candidate to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt - Appeals allowed
JUDGMENT
JASWANT SINGH, J. :—These appeals No. 41 and 42 of 1977 by special leave are directed against the common judgment and order dated December 16, 1975 made by the Commissioner, Pune Division Poona, in Election Petitions Nos. COP/81 (43) and COP/81 (42) presented under S. 144-T of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with R. 74 of the Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committees Rules, 1971 setting aside the election of the appellants to the Board of Directors of the Shetkari Sahakari Sangh Ltd., Kolhapur (hereinafter referred to as The Sangh) on the ground that they were guilty of corrupt practice as envisaged by S. 144-I (3) of the Act in that special buses were procured on payment from the Kolhapur Municipal Transport with the appellants knowledge and consent and used for the whole day on November 20, 1973 i.e. the day of poll for the free transport of the voters from the Sanghs Head Office in Bhawani Mandap to the polling station in Market Yard and back.
2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to these appeals which lie in a short compass are : The Sangh which is specified Co-operative Society as defined in S. 144-A read with S. 73-G of the Act and was registered in or about the year 1939 and as such is now deemed to be a registered society under the Act with the entire Kolhapur District as its area of operation has voting members of two types viz. (1) individual members and (2) Co-operative Societies. Being a Society belonging to one of the categories specified in S. 73-G of the Act, election of the members of its Board of Directors was held in the manner laid down in Chapter XI-A of the Act and the rules made thereunder in the second half of the year, 1973. In the said election two groups - one headed by Jagtap Guruji as representing the respondents 1 and 2 who were the petitioners in the aforesaid election petitions and the other headed by Baba Nesarikar, who was the Managing Director of the Sangh prior to the election entered the fray. In the said Election, all the three appellants in Appeal No. 41 and all the six appellants in the sister Appeal No. 42 were declared elected from the constituency of individual members numbering 25000 and the constituency of the Co-operative Societies affiliated to the Sangh numbering 650 respectively. Baba Nesarikar was himself returned unopposed from the combined constituency of individual members and Co-operative Societies. Thus the Nesarikar group captured all the seats contested by it. Aggrieved by the result of the election in so far as it related to the aforesaid two constituencies of individual members and the Co-operative Societies, respondents 1 and 2 filed two separate election petitions Nos. COP/81 (43) and COP/81 (42) under S. 144-T of the Act read with R. 74 of the Maharashtra Specified Co-operative Societies Elections to Committees Rules, 1971 challenging the validity of the aforesaid elections to the Board of Directors of the Sangh. The said election petitions though challenged on a number of grounds were allowed by the Commissioner by his aforesaid judgment and order on the sole ground that the appellants were guilty of corrupt practice as envisaged by S. 144-1 (3) of the Act in that special vehicles were hired with the knowledge and consent of the appellants for the free conveyance of voters from Bhawani Mandap to the polling station and back and used as such on the day of the poll. Section 144-I (3) of the Act under which the election of the appellants has been declared void runs as follows :-
"144-I ........................
(3) The hiring or procuring whether on payment or otherwise, of any vehicle or vessel by a candidate or his agent or by any other person with the consent of a candidate or his election agent, or the use of such vehicle or vessel for the free conveyance of any elector (other than the candidate himself, the members of his family or his agent) to or from any polling sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.