SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(SC) 331

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, P.S.KAILASAM
Gullapalli Krishna Das – Appellant
Versus
Vishumolakala Venkayyas – Respondent


JUDGMENT

KAILASAM, J. :—This appeal arises by special leave granted by this Court against the judgment and decree dated December 29, 1971 by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in L.P.A. No. 9 of 1971. The appellant in this Court is the plaintiff. He filed the Suit No. O.S. 3 of 1963 against the respondents for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule properties with past and future mesne profits.

2. One Dhara Suryanarayana and Nageswarudu were brothers and were members of a joint Hindu family. Suryanarayana died in 1896 leaving behind his widow Kutumbamma. The joint family owned 80 acres of wet land at the time of his death. Subsequently, Nageswarudu put Kutumbamma in possession of the suit schedule properties in lieu of her maintenance, in 1897. On September 29, 1956 Kutumbamma registered a will in favour of the appellant bequeathing him the suit lands and died in 1959. Negeswarudus son Venkata Subrahmanya Sastry issued a registered notice dated November 12, 1958 asserting that Kutumbamma was not entitled to the suit property absolutely. Kutumbamma replied denying the allegation. After the death of Kutumbamma, Venkata Subrahmanya Sastry issued a notice to the appellant. The appe





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top