SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 55

M. H. BEG, P. N. BHAGWATI, V. D. TULZAPURKAR
Tolaram Bijoy Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
B.B.Ahuja, R.N.SACH, S.K.NANDY, T.A.Ramachandran

JUDGMENT

BEG, C.J.I. :— The appellant, a Hindu Undivided Family, is before us by special leave through its Karta Tolaram. The statement of the case shows that Narmal, who died in the year 1945, left three sons, Srinivas, Nathmal and Tolaram Narmal had carried on an Hindu undivided family business started round about 1925. It appears that the name of the business was changed to Nathmal Tolaram from 1936-37 and that the income of the business was assessed as Hindu Undivided Family income since then. The previous records do not seem to be very clear. but, from the year 1942 to 1950, the income of this business was certainly assessed as Hindu Undivided Family income. It was partitioned with effect from 6th April. 1949. After the partition, the business carried on at two places, Dhubri and Gauripore, was converted into a partnership business evidenced by a deed of partnership executed between the three brothers on 7th April, 1949. In this deed, it was admitted that the business had been carried on previous to the partition as Hindu Undivided Family business.

2. On 19th September, 1950, an application was made under section 25A the Income-tax Act, 1922, to record and register the partitio
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top