SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 120

P.S.KAILASAM, R.S.SARKARIA
G. Appaswami Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
R. Sarangapani Chettiar – Respondent


Advocates:
K.JAYRAMAN GOWDA, K.RAM KUMAR, MALINI PODVAL, R.THIAGARAJAN, S.RAJAGOPALAN, Sunanda Bhandare

JUDGMENT

KAILASAM, J.:— This appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Madras on certificate. Appellants are the sisters grandsons of one Gopalasami Chettiar. The first defendant Ramathilakam Ammal is the daughter of Gopalasami Chettiar and the second defendant the adopted son of the first defendant is the sisters grandson of her husband Sethu Chettiar. The two defendants are respondents 1 and 2 in this appeal. Defendants 3 and 4 are the alienees of certain properties of Gopalasami Chettiar from respondents 1 and 2.

2. The suit was filed by the appellants for (1) a declaration that the adoption of the second respondent by the first respondent is not true and valid; (2) declaring that in any event the second respondent as an adopted son could not take the estate of Gopalasami Chettiar either under the will of Gopalasami or by succession; (3) a declaration that alienations made by respondents 1 and 2 on 16th December, 1956 in favour of respondents 3 and 4 are not binding on the reversioners of Gopalasami Chettiar and will not enure beyond the lifetime of the first respondent.

3. The trial court found that the adoption was true
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top