SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 150

P.S.KAILASAM, R.S.SARKARIA
Nagu Reddiar – Appellant
Versus
Banu Reddiar – Respondent


Advocates:
K.JAYRAMAN GOWDA, K.RAM KUMAR, LILY THOMAS, P.R.MRIDUL, T.S.KRISHNAMURTHY IYER

JUDGMENT

P. S. KAILASAM. J.:— These two appeals are by certificates granted by the High Court of Madras against a common judgment in A. S. No. 114 and A. S. No. 194 of 1958.

2. These appeals arise out of a suit filed by the plaintiffs in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli in O. S. No. 152 of 1955 under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure for removing one Negu Reddiar, the first defendant, from the trusteeship of the suit charities and for framing a scheme for the said charities. The trial court found that the two charities in question were public trusts and comprised all the alienated properties except item 7 of plaint-A Schedule to the trust properties. The trial court found that B-Schedule properties were bequeathed for performance of Puja in the Samadhi and for feeding the Agathies and Paradesies in the Matam and that the Samadhi could not be separated from the Matam and therefore the dedication of the B Schedule properties in favour of the Matam and Samadhikoil is invalid in law. The court ordered the removal of the defendant from the office of the trusteeship and directed him to render accounts and ordered the framing of a scheme for plaint A Schedule prop

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top