SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 134

JASWANT SINGH, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Chief Commissioner, Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Cloth And General Mills Company LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.GOYAL, D.R.THADANI, GIRISH CHANDRA, Hardayal Hardy, O.P.RANA, R.P.BHATT, SOBHAG MAL JAIN

JUDGMENT

FAZAL ALI, J.:— This appeal by certificate is directed against the judgment and order of the Circuit Bench of the Punjab High Court at Delhi dated the 7th May 1964 and arises in the following circumstances:

2. The respondent Company floated debenture loan of Rs. 2.50 crores and to secure the repayment of the said loan, executed debenture trust deed dated 10th April, 1962 mortgaging certain properties of the Company for consideration of Rs. 2.50 crores in favour of the trustees who were petitioners before the High Court. Further details have been given in the judgment of the High Court and it is not necessary to repeat them here. It appears that stamps to the extent of Rs. 2,50,300/- were paid under the Indian Stamp Act and apart from that when the document was presented for registration, a fee of Rs. 1,25,157.50 np. was demanded as registration fee by the Sub-Registrar under a notification issued by the Chief Commissioner of Delhi, which is the impugned notification in this case. The registration fee was paid by the respondents under compulsion but the trustees filed a petition in the High Court challenging the validity of the notification and the exorbitant amount realis













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top