SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 155

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. SHINGHAL AND D.A. DESAI, JJ.**
Mohan Lal and another, Petitioners
Versus
Ajit Singh and another, Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 377 of 1975
Decided on  2-5-1978.
Advocates appeared
Mr. S. C. Manchanda, Sr. Advocate (Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Advocate with him), for Appellants: Mr. D. Mookerjee, Sr. Advocate (M/s S. K. Mehta, K. R. Nagaraja and P. N. Puri, Advocates with him) (for No. 1) and Mr. Hardev Singh Advocate (for No. 2), for Respondents.

Advocates:
D.MUKHERJI, K.R.NAGARAJA, N.K.AGRAWAL, P.N.PURI, S.C.Manchanda, S.K.MEHTA

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code – Section 302/ 392/ 397 - Evidence Act – Section 27 - Rigorous imprisonment – Offence of murder – Injury - It had many injuries and a blood stained blade of knife as lying near it. A black piece of cloth (fifty) was lying at some distance towards the road - As used to bring home the money of Societies some times suspected that the respondent might have murdered him for the money. It seemed to him that the black piece of cloth belonged to the respondent which he was wearing on the previous morning which was at a distance of about 9 miles from the place of occurrence. As he found Sub-Inspector bus stand, he reported the matter to him - Sub-Inspector recorded Mohan statement and sent it along with constable Mal Singh to police station for registering a case – Held, Recovery of the incriminating articles in pursuance of the respondents information is an important piece of evidence against him. As has been held by this Court in Criminal Appeals question whether a presumption should be drawn against the respondent under illustration (a) of S. 114 of the Evidence Act is a matter which depends on the evidence and the circumstances of each case - Nature of the recovered articles, the manner of their acquisition by the owner, the nature of the evidence about their identification, the manner in which the articles were dealt with by the accused, the place and the circumstances of their recovery, the length of the intervening period and the ability or otherwise of the accused to explain the recovery, are some of those circumstances - As the ring was made of gold and bore the initials of the deceased, and the goldsmith had established its identity, there could be no doubt whatsoever that it belonged to the deceased - It is also a matter of great significance that it was found tied in a handkerchief along with the other two highly incriminating articles, namely finger marked currency note Ex. P-10 and the respondents purse Ex. P-9 about whose identity there can possibly be no reason for any doubt - Respondent knew that he would be suspected of the crime because the deceased was last seen in his company, and the fact that he buried the articles near the water lift in the middle of the way leading from shows that he wanted the articles to lie there until he could feel reassured enough to dig them out. It however so happened that he was suspected from the very beginning, was arrested within four days and gave the information within the next two days which led to the discovery of an important fact within the meaning of S. 27 of the Evidence Act. It must therefore be held that the incriminating articles were acquired by the respondent at one and the same time and that it was he and no one else who had robbed the deceased of the money and the ring and had hidden them at a place and in a manner which was known to him. Then there is the further fact that the respondent was unable to explain his possession of the ring and the money and did not even attempt to do so - Appeal allowed

JUDGMENT

SHINGHAL, J.:— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated July 9, 1975, giving benefit of doubt to respondent Ajit Singh (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) and acquitting him of offences under Ss. 302, 392 and 397, I. P. C. for which he was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge of Faridkot on October 31, 1974. The Additional Sessions Judge had sentenced the respondent to death for the offence under S. 302, I. P. C. and to rigorous imprisonment for five years and seven years respectively for the offences under Sections 392 and 397 I. P. C.

2. Nishan Chand (deceased), son of appellant Mohan Lal (P. W. 5), was a resident of Roranwali. He was Secretary of Roranwali and Phulu Khera Co-operative Societies. The respondent was Nishan Chands friend and was Secretary of Roranwali Patti Sikhan Co-operative Society. He also used to live in village Roranwali with his maternal-uncle Gurdial Singh who was the village Chairman.

3. It is alleged that Nishan Chand and the respondent left together on June 17, 1974, for villages Lambi and Malout on Nishan Chands bicycle, as they had to deposit the money realised by them. They did not however return to Roranwali that night. Mohan Lals other son Satpal, who was studying in Class VIII in a school at Sikhanwala, saw Nishan Chands bicycle lying at some distance from the boundary of village Roranwali, near a culvert, on the "pakka" road leading to Sikhanwala, and he also saw a man lying dead in a field at a short distance from there. As the dead body appeared to be of Nishan Chand, Satpal went back to his house and informed his father Mohan Lal (P. W. 5) at about 7 a. m. Mohan Lal (P. W. 5) and his brother Dharam Chand (P. W. 8) went to the place where the dead body was lying. It had many injuries and a blood stained blade of knife (Ex. P-3) was lying near it. A black piece of cloth (fifty) was lying at some distance towards the road. As Nishan Chand used to bring home the money of the Societies some times, Mohan Lal suspected that the respondent might have murdered him for the money. It seemed to him that the black piece of cloth ("fifty") belonged to the respondent which he was wearing on the previous morning. Mohan Lal therefore left for police station Lambi, which was at a distance of about 9 miles from the place of occurrence. As he found Sub-Inspector Harnek Singh (P. W. 19) at Sikhanwala bus stand, he reported the matter to him at about 9.30 a.m. The Sub-Inspector recorded Mohan Lals statement and sent it along with constable Mal Singh to police station Lambi for registering a case.

4. S. I. Harnek Singh went to the place of occurrence with Mohan Lal and found Dharam Chand (P. W. 8) and Nishan Chands mother Smt. Agyawanti near the dead body. He found foot-prints (two of bare foot and one with the shoe) near to the dead body. The blade of knife (Ex. P. 3) was also found lying near the dead body and a shoe was found lying in the water channel at a distance of 7 or 8 karams. The small piece of black cloth ("fifty") (Ex. P-4) was found lying at a distance of 25 or 30 karams from the dear body. The Sub-Inspector recorded the statement of Smt. Agayawanti. He lifted moulds of the foot-prints and took them in his possession. The bloodstained blade of knife (Exhibit P-3) was also taken in possession vide memorandum (Ex. P-K) and was sealed. The Sub-Inspector took the shoe also in his possession. He prepared an inquest report and sent Nishan Chands dead body for post-mortem examination. Dr. P.K. Narang (P. W. 1) of Civil Hospital Gidderbaha examined the dead body and found 12 injuries, all of which were ante-mortem. The doctor found that Nishan Chands death was due to the injuries to vital organs of the brain as a result of injuries Nos. 1 and 2 which were as follows,-

"(i) A stab wound with clean cut edges 2.5 x 0.5 cm. on the front of left side of forehead just above the eyebrow. Bloodstained brain matter was coming out o






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top