SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 208

P.S.KAILASAM, R.S.SARKARIA
Chandran – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, Altaf Ahmed

JUDGMENT

SARKARIA, J.:— This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment of the High Court of Madras, whereby it maintained the conviction of the appellant Chandran under section 302 read with S. 34 Penal Code, and confirmed the sentence of death inflicted on him by the Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam.

2. The prosecution case, as it emerges from the record, (including the confessional statement, Ex. P. 27 of the appellant) is as follows :-

The murdered person in this case was Gunabushanathachi, an aged wealthy widow, who was living alone in her ancestral house in the East Street of Kodiakarai. Her sons and daughters are grown-up persons and have been living separately from her. Her second son Ragupathy (P. W. 5) is living and carrying on business at Vedaranyam. Her married daughter Rukmani Ammal (P. W. 6) is living with her husband in the North Street at Kodiakarai. The husband of the deceased had died about 2.1/2 years before the occurrence in question. The deceased was managing the family properties.

3. The appellant was working as a servant in the house of the deceased till he attained the age of 15 years. Even thereafter, whenever called upon by the deceased, he used to wo





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top