SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 237

D.A.DESAI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Shiv Chand – Appellant
Versus
Ujagar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
D.D.SHARMA, G.Lal, HARDEV SINGH, K.R.NAGARAJA, P.N.PURI, R.S.SODHI, S.K.MEHTA, V.M.TARKUNDE

JUDGMENT

V. R. KRISHNA IYER, J.:— An election petition became an infant casualty because of an alleged non-joinder of a necessary party as visualised by S. 82 (b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (the Act, hereafter). That premature dismissal, by-passing investigation into the merits, has driven the petitioner-appellant to this Court where he has urged that the ends of law and justice have been stultified by the strangely technical view taken by the High Court in its dismissal order.

2. A few facts, and then, a brief discussion, the point being res integra so far as this Court is concerned. The appellant before us is the election petitioner, having been a defeated candidate in the General Elections held in June, 1977. There were quite a few candidates, including one Shri Mal Singh, who appears to have retired from the contest for the seat although duly nominated as a candidate. The respondent was returned as the successful candidate and the disappointed petitioner challenged the election by filing a petition wherein, inter alia, he made allegations constituting a corrupt practice against the returned candidate and Shri Mal Singh. To such a pleading S. 82 is attracted. T














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top