P. S. KAILASAM, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, A. D. KOSHAL
Raghunath Pradhani – Appellant
Versus
Damodra Mahapatra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
CHANDRACHUD, CJI.:— Respondent 1 obtained a money decree on August 18, 1962 against respondent 3 and his mother respondent 4. On June 28, 1963 respondent 1 filed an execution petition for recovering the decretal amount and prayed therein for attachment of the immovable property belonging to respondent 3. The property was attached by an order passed by the Executing Court on July 13, 1963. On November 27, 1963 respondent 1 filed an application in the Executing Court praying that permission be obtained of the Revenue Divisional Officer for sale of the property since respondent 3 to whom the property belonged was a member of the Scheduled Tribe. The permission was considered necessary by reason of the provisions contained in Cl. 6 of the "Orissa Scheduled Areas Transfer of Immovable Property by Scheduled Tribes Regulation No. 2 of 1956." It provides:
In execution of money decree against a member of a Schedule Tribe no right, title or interest held by him in any immovable property within any scheduled area shall be liable to be attached and sold except as and if prescribed.
Rule 4 made under the aforesaid Regulation provides:
There shall be no attachment or sale of immovable prop
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.