Back
N. L. UNTWALIA, P. N. SHINGHAL, Y. V. CHANDRACHUD
Firm Surajmal Banshidhar – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Board, Ganganagar – Respondent
Judgment
SHINGHAL, J.:- These appeals by special leave arise out of a common judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated Oct. 10, 1968, by which the suits which were filed by the present appellants were dismissed in pursuance of the earlier judgment of the same court dated Nov. 9. 1964, on the ground that they were governed by S. 179 (2) of the Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951, hereinafter referred to as the Act, and were barred by limitation.
2. The facts giving rise to the appeals were different in details, but they were examined in the High Court with reference to the common questions of law which arose in all of them and formed the basis of that Courts decision against the plaintiffs. We have heard these as companion appeals, and will decide them by a common judgment.
3. It is not necessary to give the detailed facts of all the cases as it will be enough to refer to the suit which was filed by M/s. Surajmal Banshidhar and the developments connected with it, in order to appreciate the controversy.
4. The plaintiff firm referred to above carried on business in "pakka arat" and exported goods of various kinds from Ganganagar. The Municipal Board of Ganganagar realised "export du
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
