SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 349

V.D.TULZAPURKAR, P.N.BHAGWATI
Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Bijli Cotton Mills (P) LTD. Hathras District Aligarh – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, C.S.AGARWAL, CHATTERJI SUSHIL, K.C.DUA, R.A.GUPTA, S.K.JAIN, T.A.Ramachandran

Judgement Key Points

The court expressed its opinion on the issue of whether the amounts received for charitable purposes should be regarded as income of the business and whether they constitute trust funds, emphasizing that since these amounts were received with an obligation to be used exclusively for charitable purposes and were not credited as trading income, they could not be considered the business's income liable to tax. The court also opined that the concept of Dharmada is sufficiently definite and certain to create a valid trust, and that the payments made under customary and legal obligations for charity are validly earmarked and exempt from taxation (!) (!) .


Judgment

V. D. TULZAPURKAR, J. :- These three appeals are preferred on certificates of fitness granted by the Allahabad High Court under S. 66-A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. They raise a common question whether the amounts realised by the assessee-company from its customers as and for Dharmada during the three assessment years 1951-52, 1952-53 and 1953-54 are liable to be taxed as its income under the Act and the question arises in the following circumstances.

2. The assessee is a private limited company having been incorporated in the year 1943. It carries on the business of manufacturing and selling yarn. Right from the inception it used to realise certain amounts on account of Dharmada (charity) from its customers on sales of yarn and bales of cotton. The rate was one anna per bundle of 10 lbs. of yarn and two annas per bale of cotton. In the bills issued to the customers these amounts were shown in a separate column headed Dharmada. The assessee did not credit the amounts of Dharmada so realised by it in its trading account but it maintained a separate account known as the Dharmada Account in which realisations on account of Dharmada were credited and payments made out wer





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top