SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 351

JASWANT SINGH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Jagir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ranbir Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S.Narula, H.S.MARVAH, K.R.Magaraja, P.N.Pan, R.S.NARULA, S.K.MEHTA

Judgment

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- Jagir Singh, the appellant in this appeal by special leave, was married to Kirpal Kaur in 1951. Husband and wife became estranged in 1954, since when they have been living separately. Ranbir Singh, the issue of the marriage, was born in 1954. Jagir Singh married again and it is said that he has a son and a daughter by the second wife. On 25th May, 1971, Kirpal Kaur and Ranbir Singh filed an application for maintenance under S. 488 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898. One of the defences raised by the appellant to that application was that Ranbir Singh was a major and, therefore, not entitled to claim maintenance under Section 488. The Magistrate held that Ranbir Singh was a student who was unable to maintain himself and, therefore, the question whether he was a major or a minor was immaterial. On 19th May, 1973, he made an order awarding maintenance at the rate of Rs. 200 per month to Kirpal Kaur and Rs. 75 per month to Ranbir Singh. Jagir Singh filed a revision petition before the Sessions Judge. By consent of the parties, the Sessions Judge made a reference to the High Court recommending that the award of maintenance in favour of the wife should be









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top