SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
JASWANT SINGH AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
K. Gopal Reddy, Appellant
Versus
State of A.P., Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 133 of 1975, D/- 22-11-1978.
Advocates appeared
Mr. R. Nagarathnam, Advocate, for Appellant; Mr. P. Parmeshwara Rao, Sr. Advocate (Mr. G. N. Rao, Advocate with him), for Respondent.
SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 – Section 2 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 - Inquest dead body was sent for post mortem examination - Injuries - Deceased was wife of appellant - They married about one and half years before occurrence - About three months before occurrence the deceased gave birth to a female child in house of accused - After the day the mother and child according to customary practice taken by mother of deceased to her house at Krishna is about miles from Krishna - Accused used to visit his wife and often used to stay in the house of the mother - After about one and half months accused asked his mother-in-law and brother in law to send his wife to his place - They replied that she had only delivered child recently and that she would be sent to her husband house in fifth month - On according to case of prosecution the accused once again requested his mother in law to send his wife to his house - This time he also brought with him an elderly gentleman from his village - His mother In Law told him that she would send the girl in the fifth month as she had not yet regained her health after delivery - Accused and away – Held principles are now settled - At one time it was thought that an order of acquittal could be set aside for substantial and compelling reasons only and Courts used to launch on search to discover those substantial and compelling reasons - Formulae of substantial and compelling reasons good and sufficiently cogent reasons and strong reasons" and the search for them abandoned as result pronouncement of Court State of Rajasthan In case this Court harked back to the principles enunciated by Privy Council in Emperor and re - Affirmed those principles - After State of Rajasthan this Court has consistently right of Appellate Court to review the entire evidence and to come to its own conclusions - Appeal dismissed
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- This appeal has been filed under S. 2(a) of the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970. The appellant was acquitted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chittor of an offence under S. 302, I.P.C. The acquittal was reversed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the appellant was convicted under S. 302, I.P.C. and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life.
2. The deceased Subhadramma was the wife of the appellant. They were married about one and a half years before the occurrence. About three months before the occurrence the deceased gave birth to a female child in the house of the accused at Cherlopalle. After the 9th day the mother and child, according to customary practice, were taken by the mother of the deceased to her house at Krishna Kalva Cherlopalle is about 25 miles from Krishna Kalva. The accused used to visit his wife and often used to stay in the house of the deceaseds mother. After about one and a half months the accused asked his mother-in-law and brother-in-law to send his wife to his place. They replied that she had only delivered a child recently and that she would be sent to her husbands house in the fifth month. On 18th Dec., 1972, according to the case of the prosecution the accused once again requested his mother-in-law to send his wife to his house. This time he also brought with him P. W. 8 an elderly gentleman from his village. His mother-in-law P.W.2 told him that she would send the girl in the fifth month as she had not yet regained her health after delivery. The accused and P.W. 8 went away. That evening the accused again came to the house of his mother-in-law. After dinner all of them went to sleep. The house consisted of only one room. The accused, the deceased, her brother P. W. 1, her mother P. W. 2 and her grand-mother P. W. 3 were all sleeping in the room. In the middle of the night P. Ws. 1, 2 and 3 were awakened by the cry "Amma" raised by Subhadramma. On waking up they saw the accused sitting by the side of the deceased with a knife in his hand. They found the deceased bleeding profusely from the left side of her chest. P. W. 1 put his foot on the hand in which the accused was holding the knife. The accused dropped the knife which was then picked up by the grand-mother P. W. 3. Attracted by the cries raised by P. Ws. 1 to 3, the neighbours P. Ws. 4, 5, 6 and others came there. They caught hold of the accused and tied him to a pole in front of the house by means of a rope. Some of the villagers who had gathered there also gave a beating to the accused. P. W. 1 proceeded to the house of P. W. 9 the Village Munsif and reported the occurrence to him. P. W. 1 affixed his thumb impression on the report Ex. P-1 prepared by P. W. 9. P. W. 9 then proceeded to the house of P. W. 1 where the blood stained knife M. O. 1 was handed over to him. Thereafter, P. W. 9 prepared his own report Ex. P-4 and sent it along with Ex.P-1 and M. O. 1 to the Police Station at Renigunta. P. W. 14, the Sub-Inspector of Police registered the First Information Report at 5 A. M. on 19th Dec. 1972 and went ahead with the further investigation which was later taken over by the Inspector of Police P. W. 15. When the Police Officers went to the village, they found the accused tied to a pole. They arrested him and found that he had injuries on his person. They got him examined by a Doctor. After holding the inquest the dead body was sent for post mortem examination. The Medical Officer, P. W. 12 who conducted the autopsy, found on the dead body a stab wound over the left axilla 6 cms. below the arm pit 1.75 cms x 0.5 cm nearly horizontal. The stab injury had gone through the third inter-costal space and through the upper lobe of the left lung in an upward and medial direction. The upper lobe of the left lung had been cut through and through, and had collapsed. P. W. 13 the Medical Officer who examined the accused found several abrasions and contusions on the person of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.