SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 422

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, P.S.KAILASAM
G. P. Nayyar – Appellant
Versus
State (Delhi Administration) – Respondent


Advocates:
D.K.GARG, R.K.GARG, R.N.SACH, SOLI J.SORABJI, V.J.Francis

Judgment

KAILASAM, J.:- These appeals are by special leave against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Appeal No. 78 of 1967 and Order dated 11th January, 1974 in Cr. Misc. (S. C. A.) No. 80 of 1973.*

* Reported in 1974 Cri LJ 1363.

2. The appellant was charge-sheeted on 26th December, 1963 for an offence under Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code, for entering into a criminal conspiracy with one Sirajuddin and one Rahman to accept from them illegal gratification in the discharge of his official duties. He was also charged with specific offences of accepting Rs. 6,000 and Rs. 4,000 from Sirajuddin and Rehman being offences punishable under Section 161, Indian Penal Code, read with Section 5 (2) and Section 5 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. He was also charged for the offence punishable under Section 5 (2) read with Section 5 (1) (a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, that in pursuance of the aforesaid conspiracy, he, during the period from 1955 to 1961 habitually accepted illegal gratifications from the said two co-accused persons. The Special Judge who tried the case acquitted the appellant by the order dated 19th January, 1967 holding that neither th




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top