SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 93

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A.D.KOSHAL
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
D.MUKHERJI, D.P.UMYAL, K.C.JAIN, M.V.GOSWAMY, O.K.GARG, O.P.TRIVEDI, R.K.GARG, S.S.SRIVASTAVA, V.J.Francis

Judgment

FAZAL ALI, J. :- The respondents had been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Banda under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The respondents thereafter filed an appeal to the High Court of Allahabad which after a full and complete consideration of the evidence came to a finding of fact that the prosecution has not proved its case and accordingly acquitted the respondents. The High Court rejected the prosecution case mainly on two grounds. In the first place, it held that having regard to the circumstances and the distance from which the witnesses saw the accused, it was difficult for them to identify the accused. Secondly, the High Court found that in view of the medical evidence which showed that the large intestines of the stomach were absolutely empty, the evidence of the eye-witnesses could not be believed. Against the order of acquittal passed by the High Court the State came up to this Court by special leave and after obtaining the same the case has been placed before us for hearing.

2. The facts of the case have been set out in the judgment of the High Court and it is not necessary for us to repeat them again. It is well-s








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top