SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND R.S. PATHAK JJ.
State of M.P. and another etc., Appellants
Versus
Ram Ragubir Prasad Agarwal and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 2062-2063 of 1978, D/- 7-2-1979.
Advocates appeared
Mr. A. K. Sen, Sr. Advocate (M/s. K. K. Adhikari, Mr. S. K. Gambhir and Miss B. Ramrikhyanai, Advocates with him), for Appellants; M/s. N. C. Upadhya, K. P. Gupta and B. B. Tawakley, Advocates, for Respondents Nos. 1-2.
Prathamik, Middle School Tatha Madhyamik Shiksha (Pathya Pustakon Sambandhi Vyavastha) Adhiniyam – Section 2, 3, 4, 5 – Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Rapid Study – Print on School Books in Question – Respondent successfully challenged before High Court validity of prescription of States text-book for Rapid Reading, an item in syllabus for Secondary schools – Once Government books were chased out, respondent filled vacuum since prior to entry of State his book on subject had admittedly been legally in vogue – State has, by special leave, come up in appeal and secured a stay of operation of judgment of High Court, and its books are back in circulation in schools – A brief calendar of events shows that since opening of schools this academic year Government text-books have been in use uptil now, barring for about a month between the judgment of the High Court and the stay ordered by this Court – This bears upon moulding the relief since the benign power under Art. 226 is a special instrument of justice which, with flexible pragmatism and genius for equality inhibits social trauma even while upholding individual rights – Held, Syllabus for Rapid Reading suffers invalidation under S. 3 because it has not been published – Publication must precede the prescription of text-books under S. 4 or their preparation under S. 5 – Here the case of the State shows that the syllabus was published only, while the text-books were prescribed in October 1977 – So Ss. 3 and 4 have been breached and a fresh decision by Government prescribing text-books for Rapid Reading must be taken – Court is not disposed, even as in the case of the plea of no syllabus for Rapid Reading, to consider the nascent discovery of Sri Upadhyaya, counsel for the respondent, that the two text-books prescribed for Rapid Reading were not even in printed existence when they were prescribed. Judicial proceedings, especially at the earlier stages, should not ordinarily be allowed to become the scene of newly discovered points of contention – There is no substitute for proper briefs and good home-work – Never can controverted facts be raised de novo here – Court disallow the contention of non-existence of text-books in print or otherwise, when they were prescribed – If publishers of text-books or pro bono publico representationists communicate relevant matters bearing on the selection of text-books and the wisdom of the State itself undertaking the task, Government will give thought to them – There is no need to wait indefinitely for such representations – If within one month from now they are received, their merits will be examined departmentally. If, thereafter, Government considers it proper to take over the text-book business under S. 5 it is free to do so – Court make it clear that the private sector has no "right" and Governments jurisdiction is wide although the State need not be allergic to private publishers if books of excellence, inexpensive and well-designed, are readily available – To harass young alumni by putting them through fresh books of the respondent (though in circulation last year) is an avoidable infliction – Therefore, for the nonce, Government books for Rapid Reading will continue in this years classes – Court direct so. Before the next academic year begins, Government will decide, under Sections 4 and 5, on preparing text-books itself or selecting from the private sector – This will be done on or before March 31, 1979 – If the decision taken is either way, the books shall be well-stocked by the end of May – Court should ordinarily have been reluctant to give directions regarding dates and months but governmental processes are often paper-logged – Fear that the State Government may not be sufficiently conscious of the due priority to be given to the tasks now set before it has persuaded us to issue these time-bound directions – Appeal Partly Allowed
Judgment
KRISHNA IYER, J. :- If Kind Midas suffered from the curse of turning into gold everything he touched, Indo-Anglian legalism suffers from the pathology of making mystiques of simple words of common usage when they are found in the Corpus Juris. We cannot afford this luxury of legalistics, the besetting sin of law-in-action. This said comment is provoked by the prolonged debate carried on with logomachic dexterity in this appeal against a meticulous judgment where the semantic complexity and definitional intricacy of innocent words like syllabus, courses of instruction and publish and the procedural mechanics for prescribing textbooks for secondary education set out in a fasciculus of sections have been investigated.
2. Law, in a democratic, pluralist society spreads over vast spaces where the Constitution of developing countries, like ours, commands the State to adventure into a profusion of welfare measures and commits to the judicial process the interpretation of legislation not to obfuscate but to objectify the meaning of enactments. The Justice System ceases to be functional if courts do not make the technology of statutory construction serve the betterment of society. In Cardozos lofty diction :-
"We may figure the task of the judge, if we please, as the task of a translator, the reading of signs and symbols given from without. None the less, we will not set men to such a task, unless they have absorbed the spirit, and have filled themselves with a love, of the language they must read." *1
* 1. The Nature of the Judicial Process by Benjamin N. Cardozo p. 174.
If a broad and viable reading of statutory language were not adopted by Judges filled with the wish to make things work according to social justice courts may be classed with the dinosaurs.
3. The State of Madhya Pradesh, alive to its obligation to promote education in widest commonality, with accent on quality and cost, among the impressionable generation, undertook the task of statutory regulation of teaching material for primary education, middle school education, and secondary education. Then followed, in conformance with the rule of law, executive action, legislative measures, regulatory procedures and infra-structures, necessary for the incarnation of a State-directed but expert-oriented scheme of pre-university education. A painstakingly accurate and comprehensively detailed statement of the project, with an integrated analysis of the statutory provisions and erudite enunciation of the law, is found in the judgment of Bhagwati, J. in Naraindas, (1974) 3 SCR 624 if we may say so with respect, that a repeat performance here again may be supererogatory. We read that ruling into this judgment by incorporation, as it were, and content ourselves with a skeletal projection of the legislation with special reference to the key sections, viz., Ss. 3, 4 and 5 of the Madhya Pradesh Act. No. 13 of 1973. Its title is Prathamik, Middle School Tatha Madhyamik Shiksha (Pathya Pustakon Sambandhi Vyavastha) Adhiniyam (hereinoafter referred to, for short, as the 1973 Act.)
4. The respondent before us who was the petitioner before the High Court - is a private publisher. It may be cynical to say that text-books are commodity for consumers of schools education and there is big money in the trade especially when the private sector in the book business has been enjoying a ready market provided by the proliferation of schools and the obligatory purchase of text-books, once Government prescribes them. So, behind the veil of educational excellence, formulation of syllabi and competent text-books is the vast profit pouring into private publishers. In our system, unalloyed public interest litigation, though organisation crusading in the field, is yet a consummation devoutly to be wished, and private vested interests are the vociferous ventriloquists of public causes. Democratic participation in the justice process gains reality only when popular organs blossom from the desert and enter
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.