SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 158

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Bishnu Deo Shaw – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.S.CHATTERJEE, H.C.MITTAL

Judgment

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :- "The murderer has killed. It is wrong to kill. Let us kill the murderer." That was how a Mr. Bonsell of Manchester (quoted by Arthur Koestler in his Drinkers of Infinity), in a letter to the Press, neatly summed up the paradox and the pathology of the Death Penalty. The unsoundness of the rationale of the demand of death for murder has been discussed and exposed by my brother Krishna Iyer, J., in a recent pronouncement in Rajendra Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Criminal Appeal No. 512 of 1978, D/- 9-2-1979 : (reported in AIR 1979 SC 916) I would like to add an appendix to what has been said there.

2. The dilemma of the Judge in every murder case, "Death or life imprisonment for the murderer?" is the question with which we are faced in this appeal. The very nature of the penalty of death appears to make it imperative that at every suitable opportunity life imprisonment should be preferred to the death penalty. "The penalty of death differs from all other forms of criminal punishment, not in degree but in kind. It is unique in its total irrevocability. It is unique in its rejection of rehabilitation of the convict as a basic purpose of criminal jus



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top