SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 74

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.SARKARIA
Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Aribam Pishak Sharma – Respondent


Judgment

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- The appellant filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, Manipur, challenging the orders dated 11th August, 1961 and 30th September, 1961 of the Chief Commissioner of Manipur. The substance of his complaint was that the Chief Commissioner had permitted, by these orders, the settlement of part of the public road on respondents 1 to 4, thereby preventing the petitioners free access to the public road from the adjoining land belonging to the petitioner on which his homestead was situated. The Writ Petition was contested on various grounds. By his judgment dated 25th May 1965, the learned Judicial Commissioner allowed the Writ Petition on the ground that the settlement of land which was part of a public road was prohibited by the Manipur Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960, as well as the Manipur Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The learned Judicial Commissioner who decided the Writ Petition was Shri Rajvi Roop Singh, J. C. Thereafter, on 2nd July, 1965, respondents 1 to 4 filed an application for review purporting to be under Order 47, Rule 1 and Section 151, Civil Procedure





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top