SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. SHINGHAL AND P.S. KAILASAM, JJ.
Indian Oxygen Ltd., Appellant
Versus
The Workmen employed by M/s. Indian Oxygen Ltd., Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 2335 of 1978, D/- 9-1-1979.
Advocates appeared
Mr. F. S. Nariman, Sr. Advocate (M/s. O. C. Mathur, D. N. Misra, Advocates with him) for Appellant; Mr. M. K. Ramamurthi, Sr. Advocate (M/s. Jitendra Sharma and Janardan Sharma Advocates with him), for Respondents.
Central Act – Sections 18, 36 – U. P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 – Rule 5 – U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Sections 2, 3, 6, 7 – Industrial Dispute – Appeal by special leave by directed against the order of Industrial Tribunal (III) U. P. at Kanpur, deciding the following two preliminary issues which were raised by the Indian Oxygen Ltd. against the Company – Whether present dispute is not an industrial dispute in the light of the objections raised by the employers in paragraph (1) of their Written Statement – Whether the present Order of Reference is bad in law in the light of the objections raised by the employers in paragraph (1) of their Written Statement – Held, It was in the facts and circumstances of that case that this Court took the view that it was not possible to scan the settlement in bits and pieces and hold some parts good and acceptable and others bad – Even so, this Court expressed the view that unless the objectionable part was shown to outweigh all the other advantages, the Court would be slow to hold the settlement unfair and unjust – Herbertsons is therefore no authority for the argument that a part of a package deal cannot be the subject matter of a reference for adjudication by the Tribunal. New Standard Engineering Co. Ltd. (AIR 1978 SC 982) was also a different case, for there the justness and fairness of the settlement was examined with reference to the situation as it stood on the date on which it was arrived at, and it cannot also avail the argument of Mr. Nariman about the illegality of a reference merely because it relates to a part of a package deal – That is essentially a matter for the Tribunal to examine and adjudge on the merits of the reference – There is thus no force in the arguments which have been advanced for the purpose of showing that the settlements debarred the State Government from making the impugned order of reference under S. 4-K of the U. P. Act or that the dispute was not an industrial dispute and the order was otherwise bad in law – Appeal fails and is dismissed – Appeal Dismissed
Judgment
P. N. SHINGHAL J.:- This appeal by special leave by directed against the order of Industrial Tribunal (III) U. P. at Kanpur dated July 14, 1978, deciding the following two preliminary issues which were raised by the Indian Oxygen Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company) against the Company.
"(1) Whether present dispute is not an industrial dispute in the light of the objections raised by the employers in paragraph (1) of their Written Statement?
(2) Whether the present Order of Reference is bad in law in the light of the objections raised by the employers in paragraph (1) of their Written Statement?"
2. The Company employed some 5400 workmen in its establishment in West Bengal, Bihar, U. P. Assam, Punjab, Delhi, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamilnadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Kerala. There were several recognised trade unions of the workmen. The All-India Federation of Indian Oxygen Employees Union (hereafter referred to as the Federal Union) was the recognised federation of some of the trade unions from 1973 onwards. The Indian Oxygen Shramik Sangh (hereafter referred to as the Shramik Sangh), which represented some of the workmen at Kanpur, was affiliated to the Federal Union. There was another union known as the Indian Oxygen Karamchari Union (hereafter referred to as the Karamchari Union) which was registered much earlier but its constitution was revised because of the merger of two other unions in it and was approved by the Registrar of Trade Unions on May 10, 1973. It was not a member of the Federal Union.
3. The Federal Union raised a charter of demands in February 1973 of all India nature and a settlement was arrived at on June 22, 1973, according to which the demand for revision of pay scales was to be taken up for discussion at a mutually convenient date. A similar settlement was made with the Shramik Sangh on November 22, 1973. It was followed by negotiations and an order was made for the constitution of a Conciliation Board under S. 3 (d) of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereafter referred to as the U. P. Act). A memorandum of settlement was drawn up on April 30, 1974 between the Company and the Shramik Sangh. It was agreed, inter alia, that the question of revision of the dearness allowance of the Kanpur unit employees would be negotiated by the Company with the Federal Unit and/or the Union on or before April 1, 1975.
4. In the meantime, the Karamchari Union made an application on Jan. 23, 1975, for the constitution of a Conciliation Board under S. 3 (d) of the U. P. Act and the Board was constituted by an order dated January 30, 1975. The Company raised objections to the constitution of the Board on February 24, 1975, but the proceedings were commenced by the Board on February 26. 1975 and March 19, 1975 was fixed for appearance. The Company however proceeded with its efforts for a settlement with the federal Union and entered into a settlement with it on June 30, 1975. In order to bring it under the purview of the U. P. Act, the Shramik Sangh applied on July 18, 1975, for the constitution of conciliation Board under that Act and a Conciliation Board was constituted on July 29, 1975. A memorandum of settlement about the dearness allowance was drawn up with the Shramik Sangh on Aug. 27, 1975, in accordance with rule 5-A of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957, in Form 1A, even though the dispute regarding the variable dearness allowance, which had been raised by the Karamchari Union earlier was pending all the while. The settlement with the Shramik Sangh made a specific reference to the all-India Federation settlement which had been made on June 30, 1975. That settlement with the Federal Union was in fact annexed to the settlement with the Shramik Sangh and was treated as a settlement under U. P. Act.
5. The dispute regarding the variable dearness allowance which had been raised by the Karamchari Sangh by its application dated January 23, 1975 for the constitution of a Conciliation Board, did
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.