SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 127

P.N.BHAGWATI, A.D.KOSHAL
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Digambar Balwant Kulrkarni – Respondent


Advocates:
A.G.Ratnaparkhi, GIRISH CHANDRA, M.N.SHROFF

Judgment

KOSHAL, J.:- The facts giving rise to this appeal by the two defendants (who are the State of Maharashtra and one of its Executive Engineers) on certificate granted by the High Court of Bombay against its judgment dated 11th July 1968 may be briefly stated. In the year 1955, defendant No. 1 decided to construct an aqueduct over Kulthi Nala situated in Malegaon Sub-Division of Nasik district. The Executive Engineer, Nasik Irrigation Division, invited tenders for the work which was entrusted to the plaintiff in acceptance of his tender on conditions reduced to writing in the from of exhibit 66. The estimated cost of the work was Rs. 1, 55,854-00 and it was to be completed within 12 months from the date of the written order to commence it which happened to be the 16th of May 1955. The plaintiff paid a sum of Rs. 1.558 as earnest-money and another of Rs. 3,896 as security deposit to defendant No. 1. Clauses (2) and (3) of the contract in accordance with which the work was to be executed provided as follows:-

"(2) The time allowed for carrying out the work as entered in the tender shall be strictly observed by the contractor xx xx The work shall throughout the stipulated period o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top