SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI AND A.D. KOSHAL, JJ.
Manilal Girdharilal Shah, Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat, Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 150 of 1974, D/- 31-1-1979.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 471 – Forged Bonds – In this appeal by special leave the appellant has been convicted under Sec. 471, I.P.C. and sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/- Mr. V. S. Desai has pressed this appeal on the question of sentence only – It appears from the record that the appellant has served more than two months in jail – Held, Although a forged Bank Gurantee Bond was filed by the appellant before the Public Works Department but as soon as the forgery was detected the appellant immediately withdrew the bond and paid Rs. one lakh and forty three thousand by way of fixed deposit receipts – Thus even if the appellant had used forged documents, it is clear that no loss has been caused to anybody – Court is inclined to take a lenient view of the matter – Court, therefore, while upholding the conviction of the appellant reduce the sentence of imprisonment to the period already served and for the balance of the sentence remitted court impose an additional fine of Rs. 4,000/-. – Total fine imposed is Rs. 5,000/- in default six months rigorous imprisonment – Appeal Dismissed
Judgment
FAZAL ALI, J. :- In this appeal by special leave the appellant has been convicted under Sec. 471, I.P.C. and sentenced to one years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/- Mr. V. S. Desai has pressed this appeal on the question of sentence only. It appears from the record that the appellant has served more than two months in jail. From the facts found by the Courts below it also appears that although a forged Bank Gurantee Bond was filed by the appellant before the Public Works Department but as soon as the forgery was detected the appellant immediately withdrew the bond and paid Rs. one lakh and forty three thousand by way of fixed deposit receipts. Thus even if the appellant had used forged documents, it is clear that no loss has been caused to anybody. In this view of the matter we are inclined to take a lenient view of the matter. We, therefore, while upholding the conviction of the appellant reduce the sentence of imprisonment to the period already served and for the balance of the sentence remitted we impose an additional fine of Rs. 4,000/-. Thus, the total fine imposed is Rs. 5,000/- in default six months rigorous imprisonment. With his modification, the appeal is dismissed.
Ordered accordingly.
For Citation : AIR 1979 SC 1343
Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.