SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
JASWANT SINGH AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
Tehal Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab, Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1978, D/- 27-10-1978.
Arms Act – Section 27 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 120, 302, 34 – Order of Acquittal – Tehal Singh was convicted under Section 302, Indian Penal Code on three counts and sentenced to death by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridkot – His brothers Darshan Singh and Gurmal Singh were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life – Bhal Singh was also convicted under Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for three years – Convictions and sentences were confirmed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana – Tehal Singh, Darshan Singh and Gurmel Singh have appealed to this Court by special leave – Chiman Lal and Murari Lal who were also tried with the three appellants for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code were acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge – There was no appeal to the High Court against their acquittal – Held, One of them was armed with a gun, the other two were armed with iron rods – One of them challenged the deceased – Person who was armed with the gun opened fire and after the deceased fell down the other two accused were not content but went forward to inflict injuries on the deceased persons with the iron rods in their hands – Thereafter all of them went away together – Irresistible inference from these circumstances is that the three of them were actuated by the common intention to cause the death of the deceased – Merely because the injuries inflicted by Darshan Singh and Gurmel Singh were not serious injuries, it cannot be said that they were not actuated by the common intention to cause the death of the deceased – In order to attract the applicability of Section 34 read with Section 302, it is not necessary that each and every one of the accused persons must have inflicted a serious injury – It was lastly contended that Tehal Singh should not be awarded the extreme penalty since the evidence showed that there was some provocation on the part of Pirthi Singh – It is difficult to agree with this submission – Action of the deceased Pirthi Singh which might be said to have given rise to some provocation was not part of the same incident – Provocation, if any, was to Darshan Singh and not to Tehal Singh – After the earlier incident Darshan Singh went away – It was a few hours thereafter that the three accused persons came armed with gun and iron rods and attacked the deceased – Mithu Singh and Gurmel Singh has offered no provocation at all – Their only sin was that they attempted to intervene when Pirthi Singh was shot at – Court do not think that we will be justified in interfering with the sentence awarded by the Sessions Judge and confirmed by the High Court – Appeal Dismissed
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :- Tehal Singh was convicted under Section 302, Indian Penal Code on three counts and sentenced to death by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridkot. His brothers Darshan Singh and Gurmal Singh were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life. Bhal Singh was also convicted under Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for three years. The convictions and sentences were confirmed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Tehal Singh, Darshan Singh and Gurmel Singh have appealed to this Court by special leave. Chiman Lal and Murari Lal who were also tried with the three appellants for an offence under Section 302 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code were acquitted by the learned Sessions Judge. There was no appeal to the High Court against their acquittal.
2. The brief case of the prosecution was as follows : There was some rivalry between Chiman Lal and Murari Lal who were transport operators on one side and Prithi Singh and Harmal Singh, who were also transport operators on the other side. One 22nd August, 1976, Pirthi Singh, his brother Harmel Singh. Mithu Singh and Hardip Singh the son of Pirthi Singh a boy aged 13 years were returning to their village Giddarbaha from Hussaner in their truck. They met Darshan Singh near the outskirts of Hussaner Chowk. Pirthi Singh questioned Darshan Singh as to why he had threatened the Munshi of their Truck Union. There was an exchange of abuse, Pirthi Singh also slapped Darshan Singh. Darshan Singh left the scene in a vengeful mood. Pirthi Singh, Mithu Singh, Harmel Singh and Hardip Singh then proceeded to the premises of the agency of Parma Nand. While they were sitting there, at about 8 p.m. Chhota Singh came there and informed them that when he had gone to the agency of Chiman Lal to hire a truck, sometime earlier he had heard Chiman Lal and Murari Lal telling Tehal Singh, Darshan Singh and Gurmel Singh, that they should finish off Pirthi Singh. Within a few minutes after Chhota Singh informed Pirthi Singh and others about the conversation at Chiman Lals agency. Tehal Singh, Darshan Singh and Gurmel Singh arrived at Parma Nands agency in a truck. Tehal Singh was armed with a double-barreled gun while Darshan Singh and Gurmel Singh were armed the iron rods. Straightway Darshan Singh challenged Pirthi Singh and said he would be taught a lesson. Tehal Singh fired a shot which hit Pirthi Singh on the right shoulder, felling him to the ground. Darshan Singh beat the fallen Pirthi Singh three or four times with the iron rod which he had with him. Mithu Singh tried to intervene when Tehal Singh shot at him and killed him instantaneously. Harmel Singh came forward and he too was shot at by Tehal Singh on the right knee. He stumbled over a few paces and fell down when Darshan Singh and Gurmel Singh assaulted him with iron rods which were with them. Tehal Singh then fired a shot into the air and thereafter all the assailants drove away in their truck. Pirthi Singh and Harmel Singh who were both seriously injured were taken to the Hospital at Giddarbaha by Chhota Singh, Hardip Singh and others who had come there after the occurrence. Pirthi Singh died on the way. It was 10.15 p.m. when Harmel Singh was taken to the Hospital, Dr. Pasricha, the Medical Officer In-charge of the Hospital sent a report to the Police Post at 10.20 p.m. Kulwant Singh, Head Constable who was in-charge of the police post reached the Hospital at 10.40 p.m. and after inquiring whether Harmel Singh was in a fit condition to make a statement, he proceeded to record the statement of Harmel Singh. The statement was recorded in the presence of Dr. Pasricha who appended a certificate to the effect that the statement was recorded in his presence and that Harmel Singh was in full possession of his senses throughout. The statement was sent to the Police Station Kot Bhai where the First Information Report wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.