SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 121

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P.N. BHAGWATI, R.S. PATHAK AND A.D. KOSHAL, JJ.
Hussainara Khotoon and others, Petitioners
Versus
Home Secretary, State of Bihar, Patna, Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 57 of 1979,* D/- 12-2-1979 and Order passed therein on 26-2-1979 by P. N. Bhagwati and A.P. Sen, JJ.
Advocates appeared
Mrs. K. Hingorani, for Petitioners; M/s. S. M. Jha, Advocate and P. P. Singh Advocate, for Respondents.

Advocates:
K.HINGORANI, S.M.JHA, Udaipratap Singh

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 21 – Arms Act – Section 25 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 167, 468 – Government of Bihar has filed before Court a note containing the proposed clarification of paragraph 2 (e) of the Government Order, pursuant to the suggestion made by us in our order – This clarification states in paragraph one that where the police investigation in a case has been delayed by over two years, Superintendent of Police will see to it that the investigation is completed expeditiously and final report or charge-sheet is submitted by the police as quickly as possible and the responsibility to ensure this has been laid personally on the Superintendent of Police – Government of Bihar has also filed a counter-affidavit made by Mr. Mrinmaya Choudhury, Assistant Inspector General of Prisons (1), Bihar setting out the particulars in regard to 18 under-trial prisoners who have been ordered to be released by us on their personal bond – Held, Court direct the Government of Bihar to scrutinise the cases of undertrial prisoners charged with offences which are punishable with fine only or punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year or punishable with imprisonment for a term exceeding one year but not exceeding three years and release such of them who are not liable to be proceeded against by reason of the period of limitation having expired – This direction shall be carried out by the Government of Bihar within a period of six weeks from today and compliance reports containing particulars shall be submitted to this court, first at the end of four weeks and then at the end of the next two weeks – Court is not at all sure whether this provision has been complied with, because there are quite a few cases where the offences charged against the under-trail prisoners are triabal as summons cases and yet they are languishing in jail for a long number of years far exceeding six months – Court, therefore, direct the Government of Bihar to inquire into these cases and where it is found that the investigation has been going on for a period of more than six months without satisfying the Magistrate that for special reasons and in the interest of justice the continuation of the investigation beyond the period of six months is necessary, the Government of Bihar will release the under-trial prisoners, unless the necessary orders of the Magistrate are obtained within a period of one month from today – Court would also request the High Court to look into this matter and satisfy itself whether the Magistrates in Bihar have been complying with the provisions of S. 167 (5) – Petition Disposed of

Judgment

BHAGWATI J. (for himself and on behalf of Koshal J.):- This petition for a writ of habeas corpus discloses a shocking state of affairs in regard to administration of justice in the State of Bihar. An alarmingly large number of men and women, children including, are behind prison bars for years awaiting trial in courts of law. The offences with which some of them are charged are trivial, which, even if proved, would not warrant punishment for more than a few months, perhaps for a year or two, and yet these unfortunate forgotten specimens of humanity are in jail, deprived of their freedom, for periods ranging from three to ten years without even as much as their trial having commenced. It is a crying shame on the judicial system which permits incarceration of men and women for such long periods of time without trial. We are shouting from house tops about the protection and enforcement of human rights. We are talking passionately and eloquently about the maintenance and preservation of basic freedoms. But, are we not denying human rights to these nameless persons who are languishing in jails for years for offences which perhaps they might ultimately be found not to have committed? Are we not withholding basic freedoms from these neglected and helpless human beings who have been condemned to a life of imprisonment and degradation for years on end? Are expeditious trial and freedom from detention not part of human rights and basic freedoms? Many of these unfortunate men and women must not even be remembering when they entered the jail and for what offence? They have over the years ceased to be human beings; they are mere ticket-numbers. It is high time that the public conscience is awakened and the Government as well as the judiciary begin to realise that in the dark cells of our prisons there are large number of men and women who are waiting patiently, impatiently perhaps, but in vain, for justice - a commodity which is tragically beyond their reach and grasp. Law has become for them an instrument of injustice and they are helpless and despairing victims of the callousness of the legal and judicial system. The time has come when the legal and judicial system has to be revamped and restructured so that such injustices do not occur and disfigure the fair and otherwise luminous face of our nascent democracy.

2. Though we issued notice to the State of Bihar two weeks ago, it is unfortunate that on the 5th February, 1979 no one has appeared on behalf of the State and we must, therefore, at this stage proceed on the basis that the allegations contained in the issues of the Indian Express dated 8th and 9th January, 1979 which are incorporated in the writ petition are correct. The information contained in these newspaper cuttings is most distressing and it is sufficient to stir the conscience and disturb the equanimity of any socially motivated lawyer or Judge. Some of the under trial prisoners whose names are given in the newspaper cuttings have been in jail for as many as 5, 7 or 9 years and a few of them, even more than 10 years, without their trial having begun. What faith can these lost souls have in the judicial system which denies them a bare trial for so many years and keeps them behind bars, not because they are guilty, but because they are too poor to afford bail and the courts have no time to try them. It is a travesty of justice that many poor accused, little Indians, are forced into long cellular servitude for little offences because the bail procedure is beyond their meager means and trials dont commence and even if they do, they never conclude. There can be little doubt, after the dynamic interpretation placed by this Court on Article 21 in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 2 SCR 621 that a procedure which keeps such large number of people behind bars without trial so long cannot possibly be regarded as reasonable, just or fair so as to be in conformity with the requirement of that Article. It is necessary, the


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top