SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 223

A.D.KOSHAL, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Isak Md – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

FAZAL ALI, J.:- This appeal under the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 21/25-6-74 by which the High Court reversed the order of the Sessions Judge acquitting the appellants under S. 302 I.P.C. and convicted them only under S. 304 (1) and sentenced to seven years and 5 years R.I. The appellant No. 1 was sentenced to seven years R.I. and the other appellants were sentenced to five years each because of their young age. The facts have been detailed in the judgments of the Court below and it is not necessary for us to repeat the same all over again. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the judgment of the High Court and of the Sessions Judge. The occurrence in the course of which the deceased was assaulted, took place suddenly and after hot exchange of abuses, which took place between the deceased and the appellants. The appellants are said to have assaulted the deceased with sticks. There is no evidence to show as to which of the appellants struck the fatal blow on the deceased. Having regard therefore to the circumstances of the present case and the nature of


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top