Judgment

FAZAL ALI J.:- In this appeal under S. 2 (a) of the SC (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 the appellant has been convicted under S. 302 IPC and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and is directed against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. We have perused the judgment of the High Court. So far as the prosecution case is concerned, we are satisfied that the case has been fully proved by the prosecution. The main witnesses relied upon are P. Ws. 2 and 4. We have perused the evidence of these witnesses and we do not find any reason to disbelieve their evidence.

2. The only point which merits consideration is, as to what is the exact nature of the offence committed by the appellant. On the prosecution case itself, the occurrence took place without any premeditation while the deceased along with the accused and others had just finished their meals. In the circumstances, therefore, we do not think that the appellant had any intention of causing the particular injury that he caused to the deceased with a dagger on a vital part of the body viz. neck. There can however be no doubt that he must be deemed to have the knowledge that death may b