SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 134

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A.D.KOSHAL
Umedmal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

FAZAL ALI J.:- These appeals have been pressed by the counsel for the appellant on the question of sentence only. Having regard to the very marginal nature of the adulteration found by the Public Analyst. We think there is sufficient room for reduction in the sentence of the appellants. In peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, therefore, while upholding the conviction, we reduce the sentence of both the appellants to the period already served maintaining the fine imposed by the trial Court. With this modification, the appeals are dismissed.

Order accordingly.

For Citation : AIR 1979 SC 1700

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top