S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A.D.KOSHAL
Jaspal Singh: Jindra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
What is the evidentiary value of a dying declaration recorded by a police officer without attestation by a doctor? What is the standard of proof required to establish the genuineness of a dying declaration? What are the circumstances under which an act causing death can be considered an offense under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code?
Key Points: - The appeals were against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court affirming convictions and sentences under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (!) . - The prosecution alleged that the deceased was assaulted and run over by a cart driven by one of the appellants [1000183640002]. - The defense claimed false implication due to enmity and suggested the deceased might have died from excessive drink or other causes [1000183640004]. - The High Court relied on the dying declaration recorded by P.W. 12, but the Supreme Court was not satisfied with its genuineness due to the absence of medical attestation regarding the deceased's consciousness [1000183640005]. - The court found overwhelming evidence against the appellants even if the dying declaration was excluded, including the fact that the deceased was last seen with the appellants and handed over in an injured condition [1000183640005]. - Post-mortem examination indicated death was due to rupture of the bladder, consistent with being run over by a cart [1000183640002][1000183640005]. - Witnesses P.Ws. 5, 6, and 11 testified that the deceased regained consciousness and narrated the incident, and one appellant confessed to driving the cart over the deceased [1000183640006]. - The court found the thumb impression on a statement by Tej Kaur (P.W. 6) to be forged, as per an expert's report, and P.W. 6 denied making the statement [1000183640007]. - The court agreed with the Sessions Judge and High Court that the conviction under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code was appropriate, considering the lack of clear intention to cause murder but the act leading to death [1000183640008]. - The appeals were dismissed [1000183640009] (!) .
Judgment
FAZAL ALI, J. :- These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 31st August, 1973 affirming the convictions and sentences passed by the Sessions Judge on the appellants under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them to three years rigorous imprisonment.
2. The facts of the case have been detailed in the judgment of the Sessions Judge and of the High Court and it is not necessary for us to reproduce the same. It appears that Bhupinder Singh suspected that his sister was poisoned by the mother of Jaspal Singh as a result of which she fell ill, but was ultimately cured. This led to an altercation between the parties and ultimately Jindra one of the appellants apologised and the matter subsided for the time being.
3. According to the prosecution, the deceased Bhupinder Singh along with appellants Jaspal Singh and Harbans Singh had gone to village Chuni for getting their wheat ground. The party had left for village Chuni in the cart belonging to Jaspal Singh. They approached P. W. 7 Ram Karan Dass and after getting the wheat ground the accused purchased liquor. Thereafter Bhupinder Singh and some
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.