SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(SC) 316

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI AND D.A. DESAI, JJ.
Inder Singh and others, Petitioners
Versus
Kartar Singh, Respondent.
Transfer Petn. (Cri.) No. 61 of 1978, D/- 16-10-1978.

Headnote:

Transfer Case – Claim For Maintenance – Definite allegation of the petitioners is that the complaint was frivolous and it has been filed with a view to pressurise the petitioners sister to give up her claim for maintenance awarded to her against Prem Das. – It is alleged that Prem Das has deliberately pursuaded Kartar Singh to file a false complaint against the petitioners at Cuttack. – Held, As court propose to transfer the case to Chandigarh within the jurisdiction of the Punjab High Court, court do not want to make any observation on merits. – Petitioners are poor persons and it will be most difficult for them to attend the hearing at Cuttack. – On the other hand, we find from the statement of the complainant on solemn affirmation that there is absolutely no witness excepting himself regarding the incident and the entire case against the petitioners rests on the solitary statement of the complainant who easily can go to Chandigarh. – In these circumstances, the petition is allowed and the complaint filed against the petitioners, is transferred to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate – Petition Allowed

Judgment

ORDER :- Having regard to the very peculiar and extraordinary circumstances of this case, we fell that the petitioners have made out a case for transfer. The definite allegation of the petitioners is that the complaint was frivolous and it has been filed with a view to pressurise the petitioners sister to give up her claim for maintenance awarded to her against Prem Das. It is alleged that Prem Das has deliberately pursuaded Kartar Singh to file a false complaint against the petitioners at Cuttack. As we propose to transfer the case to Chandigarh within the jurisdiction of the Punjab High Court, we do not want to make any observation on merits. The petitioners are poor persons and it will be most difficult for them to attend the hearing at Cuttack. On the other hand, we find from the statement of the complainant on solemn affirmation that there is absolutely no witness excepting himself regarding the incident and the entire case against the petitioners rests on the solitary statement of the complainant who easily can go to Chandigarh. In these circumstances, the petition is allowed and the complaint filed against the petitioners, is transferred to the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate. Chandigarh.

Petition allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1979 SC 1720

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top