SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 436

R.S.PATHAK, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Labour Court, Jullundur – Respondent


Advocates:
HARDEV SINGH, O.P.Sharma, SOLI J.SORABJI

Judgment

R. S. PATHAK, J.:- In this appeal by special leave the State of Punjab appeals against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana refusing to quash an order under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for payment of gratuity to the respondents under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

2. The Hydel Department of the Government of Punjab had undertaken a Project described as the "Hydel Upper Bari Doab Construction Project". The respondents Nos. 2 to 8 were employed as work-charged employees. On completion of the work assigned to them they were retrenched, and retrenchment compensation was paid to them. The employee respondents claimed that they were also entitled to gratuity, bonus and certain other allowances and benefits. The gratuity was claimed under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The claim being disputed, the respondents applied under Section 33-C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Labour Court, Jullundur. The Labour Court made an order dated April 30, 1975 that the employee respondents were entitled to the gratuity claimed by them but not to bonus and the other allowance and benefits. A writ petition filed by the appell


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top