SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 370

A.C.GUPTA, P.S.KAILASAM
Sundari – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N.BHATT, LALIT BHARDWAJ, R.B.DABAR

JUDGMENT

P. S. KAILASAM, J.—This appeal is by special leave granted by this Court against the judgment and order of the High Court of Mysore in C.R.P. No. 931 of 1967 allowing a revision against the order passed by the Civil Judge, Mangalore, in R. I. A. No. 2266 of 1966 in O. S. No. 91 of 1950.

2. The facts of the case may be briefly stated. The parties to his litigation are governed by the Allyasanthana law prevalent in the district of South Kanara. They were members of a Kutumba descended from a common ancestress by name Manjekee. One Parameshwari and her son and daughter instituted Original Suit No. 91 of 1950 before the Court of the subordinate Judge at South Kanara for partition of properties in accordance with the provisions of the Madras Aliyasanthana Act, 1949, (Madras Act IX of 1949). The suit was dismissed by the trial Court upholding the defence raised that a certain award decree made in Original Suit No. 314 of 1924 on the file of the District Munsiff, Mangalore, amounted to a partition within the meaning of sub-section (6) of Section 36 of the Madras Aliyasanthana Act, and therefore another suit for partition was not maintainable. Though the trial Court dismissed the s


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top