R.S.PATHAK, N.L.UNTWALIA
Reliance Jute And Industries LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax W. B. , Calcutta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. S. PATHAK, J.:— This appeal by certificate under Section 66-A (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 raises a question involving the interpretation of Section 24 (2) (iii) of that Act.
2. The assessee is a company carrying on the business of manufacturing jute goods. The case relates to the assessment year 1960-61, for which the relevant accounting period is the financial year ending March 31, 1960.
3. While making the assessment for the assessment year 1959-60, the Income-tax Officer set off the unabsorbed business loss of Rs.1,58,845 for 1949-50 and Rs.5,70,952 for 1950-51 against the business income of that year and directed that Rs.15,50,189 representing the loss remaining unabsorbed should be carried forward. In the assessment proceeding for the assessment year 1960-61, with which we are concerned, the assessee claimed that the unabsorbed loss should be carried forward and set off against the business income of the current year. The Income-tax Officer rejected the claim on the ground that the unabsorbed loss related to 1950-51 and could not be carried forward for more than eight years. The assessee pressed the claim in appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.