SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 481

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. SARKARIA AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
Smt. Pramod Kumari Bhatia, Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Bhatia and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 2577 of 1969
Decided on 15-11-1979.

Advocates appeared
Mr. M. V. Goswami, Advocate, for Appellant; Mr. Mohan Behari Lal, Advocate and Mr. Vishnu Mathur, Advocate, for Respondent.

Advocates:
M.V.GOSWAMY, MOHAN BEHARI LAL, VISHNU MATHUR

Headnote:construction of will — power of the court to supply words to effectuate the intention of the testator - SECOND APPEAL#23;ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE SHOULD NOT BE ADMITTED AFTER MANY YEARS AFTER FILING OF SUIT - ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS SOUGHT TO BE FILED MANY YEARS AFTER INSTITUTION OF SUIT

       – where it is clear on the face of a Will that the testator has not accurately or completely expressed his meaning by the words he has used, and it is also clear what are the words which he has omitted, these words may be supplied in order to effectuate the intention, as collected from the context. In the case of Smt. Pramod Kumari Bhatia v. Om Prakash Bhatia, AIR 1980 SC 446 =1980(2) SCR 325 =1980(2) SCJ 30 = 1980 UJ(SC) 51 = 1980 All LJ 163 =1980(1) SCC 412, it was held that “no speculation but a compelling conviction”, that the Court would be justified in exercising its crucial draughtmanship for the testator and supplying the specific words missing from the Will. The court has undoubted jurisdiction to do so.

JUDGMENT

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :—The question in the appeal is about the construction of a will. The facts which are now not in dispute before us are as follows :

The testator, Pearey Lal Singh Bhatia died on 30-3-1952 leaving behind him a will dated 8-4-1944, a widow Lakshmi Devi being his second wife, a son Om Prakash by Lakshmi Devi, and the widow and daughters (Manmohini, Raj Kumari and Pramod Kumari respectively) of a pre-deceased son by a pre-deceased first wife. Manmohini and her daughter Raj Kumari had left the family house and moved away to Mathura while Pramod Kumari stayed on with her grand father and was brought up by him. Lakshmi Devi, widow of Pearey Lal Singh, died in 1958. We are now concerned with the title to a sum of Rs. 16,490/- lying in deposit with the State Bank of India and the District Co-operative Bank, Bulandshahr. Om Prakash claims the amount under the will dated 8-4-1944. The will, a registered one, was in the following terms :-

"I, Pyare Lal Singh, son of Babu Ghanshyam Narain Saheb, by caste Kshatriya Bhatia, resident of Mohalla Sheopuri, Bulandshahr, do declare as follows :-

I, the executant, am owner in possession of the property specified as given below in Schedules A, B and C. The property given in Schedules B and C has been purchased by me the executant, with my own funds in the name of my wife Smt. Lakshmi Devi and my son Om Prakash. In fact I, the executant, am the owner of it as well. The entire movable and immovable property, owned and possessed by me, is my self acquired property and is not ancestral property, and I the executant, have all sorts of rights to make transfer in respect thereof. Now I, the executant, am about sixty years of age and I have a wife, Lakshmi Devi, a son, Om Prakash, and two dear grand-daughters, Raj Kumari and Pramod Kumari, daughters of my first son Krishna Chandra Singh, M. A. L.L.B., who has already died in June, 1932, leaving behind his widowed wife Smt. Manmohini Devi, besides these two daughters aforesaid. Both the daughters of my deceased son aforesaid, who are my grand-daughters, are still minors. By way of prudence and for future management I, the executant, make a will as under :

That I, the executant, till I am alive, shall remain owner of my entire movable and immovable property, cash etc., which I possess at present or which may be added to it during my lifetime and which I, the executant, leave behind at the time of my death. After my death, if my wife Smt. Laxmi Devi remains alive, she will become owner of my entire estate with life interest, but she shall have no power to transfer any movable and immovable property. If my wife Smt. Lakshmi Devi predeceases me, then under such circumstances after my death my son Om Prakash, who has now appeared at the examination of the X class of the English School and who is 18 years of age, shall become permanent owner in possession of my entire estate and he shall be bound by the conditions laid down in this will. I and my wife shall be duty-bound to maintain and perform marriage etc. or my grand daughter Pramod Kumari and my son Om Prakash and it will be incumbent upon me and my wife to discharge that duty. My second grand-daughter Raj Kumari lives with her mother at Mathura. After the death of her father, she or her mother did not come to me and remained under the guidance of her maternal grand father and grand mother. Therefore, it is the duty of the mother of my grand daughter Rajkumari, who is a teacher in a girls school in Mathura city, to maintain her and perform her marriage. Even then I lay down for her as well that a sum up to Rs. 2,000/- may be given or spent for her marriage. Appropriate expenses are to be incurred over the education and marriage of my second grand daughter Pramod Kumari and my son Om Prakash, who are living with me and are getting education. My daughter-in-law Smt. Manmohini Devi aforesaid or her daughters aforesaid or my any other elation shall not have any right or share in my estate













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top