SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 22

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, A.D.KOSHAL
Mariadasan: Varuvel – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

 This is an appeal under Section 2 of the Enlargement of SC (Appellate) Jurisdiction Act, by the Appellant Mariadasan who was accused No. 2 in the trial Court. The other four accused persons, namely A1 (Varuvel), A3 (Ambrose), A4 (Prakasan) and A5 (Maria Sebasthiyan), have filed a petition for special leave against the order of conviction and sentence recorded by the High Court. The trial Court acquitted the accused of all the charges namely Sections 302/149, 307/149, 148, 147 etc.The State filed an appeal before the High Court which reversed the judgment of the trial Court and convicted Maridasan, Accused No. 2, under S. 302 to imprisonment for life, under S 324/149 to 3 years R: I., under Section 148, also to three years R.I. (sentences to run concurrently).

2. So far as the other accused were concerned the High Court convicted accused No. 1 under Section 324 to three years R.I. and to the same sentence under Section 148; Accused No. 3, under Sec. 324/149 to three years R. I. Accused No. 4 was also covicted similarly. A 5 was convicted under Section 147 to two years R.I. and under S. 324/149 to 3 years. The Special Leave Petition filed by Accused Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5 were o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top