SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 36

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N.L. UNTWALIA AND O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, JJ.
Narendra Bahadur Tandon, Appellant v. Shanker Lal (Since deceased) by Lrs., Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 575 of 1970
Decided on 25-1-1980.
Advocates appeared
M/s, S. S. Jawali and B. R. Aggarwal, Advocates, for Appellant; Mr. R. K. Garg, Sr. Advocate (Mr. V. J. Francis Advocate with him), for Respondent.

Advocates:
B.R.AGRAWAL, R.K.GARG, S.S.JAVALI, V.J.Francis

Headnote:“Any person claiming under him” – concept and meaning - Escheat — concept and applicability - DISSOLUTION OF COMPANY#23;WHETHER LIQUIDATOR CAN REPRESENT COMPANY DISSOLUTION OF COMPANY#23;WHETHER THE LIQUIDATOR CAN REPRESENT THE COMPANY - DISSOLUTION OF COMPANY#23;WHETHER LIQUIDATOR CAN REPRESENT THE COMPANY -

       – The right under this Section is available against the transferor (effecting the incomplete transfer) and any person claiming under him. It is difficult to understand how the successor in interest of a lessor can ever be said to (be) a person claiming under a lessee making an incomplete transfer of the lease held interest – See decision in Narendra Bahadur Tandon v. Shanker Lal, AIR 1980 SC 575 = 1980(2) SCC 253 = 1980 UJ (SC) 361.

       -once the company was dissolved it ceased to exist and the liquidator could not represent a non-existing company. If the liquidator was to discharge any duty or perform any function on behalf of the dissolved company he should have express statutory authority. The Companies Act contains no such provision, as observed in the case of Narendra Bahadur Tandon v. Shanker Lal, AIR 1980 SC 575 = (1980) 2 SCC 253.

JUDGMENT

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:— Hulas Chand and Bilas Chand, original owners of a certain plot of land in Saharanpur, granted a permanent lease of the land to Patal Mills Ltd., in May, 1930. The annual rent was Rs. 75. The lessee was empowered to use the land for any purpose whatsoever. The rights of the lessee were expressly made transferable, Though the lease was permanent, there was a condition that the lessor could forfeit the lease if the lessee failed to pay rent for three consecutive years. On November 1, 1932, Hulas Chand and Bilas Chand transferred their interest to Budh Singh and Jialal: Jugal Kishore, became entitled to the rights of Budh Singh and Jialal by purchase under sale deeds dated April 27, 1943 and May 11, 1943, But Shankerlal and Piareylal (present plaintiffs) filed a suit for pre-emption against the vendors and Jugal Kishore and as a result of the decree passed in the suit, they became entitled to the lessors interest in the suit plot of land on August, 13, 1945.

2. Meanwhile the lessee Patel Mills Ltd. went into liquidation and Mehra was appointed voluntary liquidator of the Company on May 11, 1937 by a special resolution at a meeting of the creditors of the Company. Banaras Bank Ltd., was the biggest creditor of the Company. So the liquidator negotiated the sale of all the assets of the Company to the Banaras Bank Ltd., for a sum of Rupees 70,000 and on February 23, 1939 executed an agreement of sale after receiving the consideration. The lease-hold interest in the suit plot was also included as one of the assets in the agreement of sale. At a meeting held on May 4, 1939 the creditors accepted the final report of the voluntary liquidator. The report was sent to the Registrar of joint Stock Companies, and registered on September 9, 1939. The Company thus stood dissolved with effect from December 9, 1939. Subsequently on March 1, 1940 the Banaras Bank Ltd. itself went into liquidation. The official liquidator of the Banaras Bank Ltd. found that there was no duly executed deed of transfer executed by the voluntary liquidator of the company in favour of the Banaras Bank Ltd. in respect of the lease-hold interest in the suit plot of land. At the instance of the official liquidator of the bank, Shri Mehara the erstwhile voluntary liquidator of the Company executed a deed of sale on January 28, 1941 and had it duly registered. On March 9, 1943 the official liquidator transferred the lease-hold interest in the suit plot of land in the defendant-appellant.

3. We have mentioned that patel Mills Ltd., stood dissolved with effect from December 9, 1939. Budh Singh and Jialal had earlier, i.e. on April 12, 1939 accepted rent from the voluntary liquidator of the Company. After the dissolution of the Company and the transfer of the lease-hold interest by the voluntary liquidator to the Banaras Bank Ltd. Budh Singh and Jialal sent a notice dated January 11, 1941 to the liquidator of the Banaras Bank Ltd. through their lawyer demanding payment of arrears of rent for four years and asserting that the lease was forfeited consequent on the lessees failure to pay rent for a continuous period of three years. The liquidator denied the claim or right of the lessor to forfeit the lease but admitted the claim for rent. Rent was accordingly paid and was accepted by Budh Singh and Jialal. Later, on March 21, 1946, Jugal Kishore who had purchased the rights of Budh Singh and Jialal also accepted rent from the official liquidator of the Banaras Bank Ltd.

4. Shankerlal and Piareylal who became entitled to the lessors interest in the suit plot of land as a result of the decree for pre-emption which they obtained against Jugal Kishore and his vendors, filed the suit out of which the appeal arises to recover possession of the land. Their case was that the lease-hold interest in the land was not validly transferred by the voluntary liquidator fan therefore, the defendant acquired no right in the land.

5. Several defenses were raised. It wa





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top