SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 510

R.S.PATHAK, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Satish Chandra Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Balahishna Gaur, GIRISH CHANDRA, SOLI J.SORABJI, SUBODH MARKANDAYA

JUDGMENT

KRISHNA IYER, J. :—An odd case of sentence of three months civil imprisonment and attachment of assets of the Central Government and two of its officers for default in instant reinstatement of a Railway Inspector removed from service for misconduct occasions this appeal by special leave.

2. The Court system is neither a cloistered virtue nor a self-righteous process and readily re-examines, in the appellate crucible, the judgments rendered at lesser levels even if the subject matter be, as here, alleged disobedience of a judicial order. Justice is not hubristic and truth triumphs by self-criticism. And so, this court, in keeping with such an invigilative perspective, must review the punitive directive of the trial court, affirmed up to the High Court but challenged before us, that the Union of India and its officers in the Railway Department - the appellants - do suffer distraint of property and imprisonment of person for the contempt of its authority by non-compliance with its order of injunction. This case disturbs us somewhat and constrains us to go to the basics in a certain branch of the jurisprudence of contempt of court.

3. As will presently appear, the synthesis of t



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top