SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 523

A.D.KOSHAL, P.S.KAILASAM, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Dhanabal – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.Mulla, A.T.M.SAMPATH, A.V.RANGAM, P.M.RAMALINGAM

JUDGMENT

KAILASAM, J.:— This appeal is by Special Leave accused 1 and 2 in S. C. 26 of 1974 on the file of Sessions Judge, South Ascot Division, against their conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No. 823 of 1974 dated 1st September, 1975.

2. The two Appellants and Muthuthamizaharesan were accused Nos, 1-3 in the Session Court, The first appellant was found guilty under Sec. 302 read with Section 149, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The second appellant and the third accused were found guilty of an offence under Section 302 read with Section 149, I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life. On appeal by the two appellants and the third accused, the third accused was acquitted by the High Court and the appellants Nos, 1 and 2 are before us.

3. The deceased Rasayal is the sister of appellants and the third accused. The first accused Dhanabal is the eldest and the second appellant and the third accused are his younger brothers. The second appellant married Laxmi, the daughter of Rasayal. Rasayal owned about 5 acres of land in Keelakkarai village. She executed a general power of attorney Exh. P-15 on 31st Aug. 1970


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top