A.D.KOSHAL, P.S.KAILASAM, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Dhanabal – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
KAILASAM, J.:— This appeal is by Special Leave accused 1 and 2 in S. C. 26 of 1974 on the file of Sessions Judge, South Ascot Division, against their conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No. 823 of 1974 dated 1st September, 1975.
2. The two Appellants and Muthuthamizaharesan were accused Nos, 1-3 in the Session Court, The first appellant was found guilty under Sec. 302 read with Section 149, I. P. C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The second appellant and the third accused were found guilty of an offence under Section 302 read with Section 149, I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life. On appeal by the two appellants and the third accused, the third accused was acquitted by the High Court and the appellants Nos, 1 and 2 are before us.
3. The deceased Rasayal is the sister of appellants and the third accused. The first accused Dhanabal is the eldest and the second appellant and the third accused are his younger brothers. The second appellant married Laxmi, the daughter of Rasayal. Rasayal owned about 5 acres of land in Keelakkarai village. She executed a general power of attorney Exh. P-15 on 31st Aug. 1970
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.