SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 94

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.SARKARIA
Babu Rao Patel – Appellant
Versus
State (Delhi Administration) – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, A.N.Karkhanis, GOBIND DAS, H.S.MARVAH, M.M.Shroff, S.Bhandan, SRIDHARAN NAMBIAR

JUDGMENT

O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:—Can political thesis or historical truth be so presented as to promote feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious groups or communities, is the question which we are called upon to answer in these two Criminal Appeals. The appellant in the two Criminal appeals is the editor, publisher and printer of a monthly magazine going by the name Mother India ! He wrote two articles under the captions A tale of two communalisms and Lingering disgrace of history. On complaints filed by the Superintendent of Police, Delhi, under Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code, he was convicted in respect of each of these articles in separate cases and sentenced in each case to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of four months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000 by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Delhi. On appeal the learned Sessions Judge, Delhi, confirmed the conviction in both the cases but reduced the sentence of fine to Rs. 500 in each case. This was confirmed by the High Court. The appellant has preferred these appeals by special leave of this Court.

2. Shri A. K. Sen, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that if the articles









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top