SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 169

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.R. KRISHNA IYER AND E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, JJ.
Som Nath, Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana, Respondent.
Special Leave Petn. (Cri.) No. 3478 of 1979
Decided on 31-3-1980.
Advocates appeared
Mr. N. C. Talukdar, Sr. Advocate (M/s. J. P. Malhotra and J. D. Jain, Advocates with him), for Petitioner.
* Criminal Appeal No. 427 of 1977 D/- 10-8-1979.

Headnote:

Evidence Act - Section 32 - Circumstances Are Sufficient - Shocking Crime Proved - Species Of Murder Horrendously - Wife Burning - Three dying declarations corroborated by other circumstances are sufficient in our view to bring home offence - Counsel has sought to discredit these declarations relevant under Section 32 of Evidence Act forgetting that they are groaning utterances of a dying woman in grip of dreadful agony which cannot be judged by standards of fullness of particulars which witnesses may give in other situations - To discredit such dying declarations for shortfalls here or there or even in many places is unrealistic unnatural and unconscionable if basically there is credibility - Terrible in this case has taken place in house and in presence of husband who has been convicted – Held, Court hardly see any reason for interfering with this conviction would have been shocked ourselves if any other course had been adopted either by trial court or by High Court - Gender justice has a high place in Indian criminal jurisprudence - Petition Dismissed.

JUDGMENT

KRISHNA IYER, J. :— Wife burning - that atrocious species of murder horrendously escalating in some parts of this country - is the shocking crime proved, according to two courts, by the prosecution in this case. Concurrent findings of fact cannot be disturbed save on enormity of improbability which we are unable to see in the present case. The three dying declarations corroborated by other circumstances are sufficient in our view to bring home the offence. Counsel has sought to discredit these declarations relevant under Section 32 of the Evidence Act forgetting that they are the groaning utterances of a dying woman in the grip of dreadful agony which cannot be judged by the standards of fullness of particulars which witnesses may give in other situations. To discredit such dying declarations for shortfalls here or there or even in many places is unrealistic, unnatural and unconscionable if basically there is credibility. The terrible in this case has taken place in the house and in the presence of the husband who has been convicted. We hardly see any reason for interfering with this conviction, would have been shocked ourselves if any other course had been adopted either by the trial court or by the High Court. Gender justice has a high place in Indian criminal jurisprudence. Dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

For Citation : AIR 1980 SC 1226

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top